Translate

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Economics of Civitai

This is one of four images I created on Civitai for just 33 yellow buzz, which means it cost me just 8 buzz to create this image, which is unfortunately useless, as were the other three images. See, I only wanted one character in the image, but I made the mistake of describing her as "a naked harem slave" and the model focussed on that word "harem" which generally means several naked women. It gave me four of them. And since I had described the slave's posture carefully and thoroughly, the model thoughtfully distributed the arms and legs among the four harem slaves. Plus whatever fraction of a slave that the indescribable lumps of flesh scattered here and there with what I think we can all agree is marvelous creativity displayed by an LLM that has NO idea how human anatomy works, was. Maybe two thirds?

 Let's talk economics. To make NSFW images on Civitai, you need yellow buzz. You can buy yellow buzz at the rate of 1,000 yellow buzz for $1.00 USD. I buy yellow buzz in ten dollar increments, and 10,000 yellow buzz lasts me well over a month ordinarily.  It's not expensive for doing images (videos are pricier). 

Typically the way it works with the inexpensive image generators is, you create your prompt (or download your starting image if you are doing image to image generation like I did in my previous post with the Second Life avatars) and you ask for four iterations, generally at a cost of between 16 and 40 yellow buzz, mostly around 30 buzz. This gives you four varying images, some of which may work well, some of which may not. Most of the time the first iteration is not particularly successful, and another iteration may be called for. Even when you get a usable image, that doesn't mean you're finished most of the time.

Very frequently you get malformed hands/feet/faces or you get weird objects where they don't belong, or you get deformed genitals or ropes and chains going where they should not go, bonds not working, and ball gags... don't get me started on ball gags! NONE of the cheap models get ball gags right, most of the time.

Early iterations can be problematical.

There are fixes for all of these issues. There are programs called loras that work with the models (the programs that create the entire image) to solve specific problems. For examples, there are loras designed to create realistic ballgags, and loras that allow you to pose the images in various kinds of bondage and loras that create characters with certain traits, etc. The loras and models are free to use, but to see if/how they'll work means you have to create the images on Civitai and that takes yellow buzz ka-ching!

And not only are there loras, there are also programs that can improve images. The costs can vary on these: there is "hires fix" one of my favorites that creates the image at a higher resolution and generally spruces it up and fixes minor details (but not deformed hands or anything like that, though it often helps with wonky eyes) but it costs about 16 buzz for a single iteration. (Fortunately, if you do four iterations, all of them look pretty much the same, so there's no point in doing more than one hires fix iteration.) There's also facefix, which replaces the face of your subject if it comes out wonky as they often do. Facefix is relatively cheap, it costs the same as a simple prompt iteration so it's not expensive, but it's very hit or miss so you tend to do four iterations when you do facefix, which works wonders sometimes and does nothing useful other times.

What's more, the cheap Civitai models (and just about every AI art program on the Web) are TERRIBLE at following prompts. Part of it is flaws in all LLM art programs. For example:

I described the male character as standing, clothed, dominant. The program  completely ignored the prompt and showed him naked, kneeling, bound, collared and chained, just like the slavegirl. LLMs like to use the same descriptors for all characters. Supposedly using the word BREAK and keeping your character descriptions entirely separate works, but lemme tell ya, it doesn't. Also, most of the time, Civitai's less expensive models get cocks wrong. They can't draw them at all, they make them look deformed, or they put weird plastic extensions on cocks that you didn't ask for (not kidding!).  

In addition, Civitai's cheaper models will fight like hell to keep from putting female models in some submissive poses. They'll make female characters kneel on their knees as shown above, no problem. But they will be DAMNED if they will show a female character with her hands tied behind their backs. Or kneeling with her head pressed against the ground and her ass hiked up in the air. (Do NOT use the words "doggie style" in your prompt because you'll probably get a furry image.)

Beyond the helper programs (I have no idea what they're called) there are sliders you can push: Denoise, which controls how closely your image follows the prompt (more about the prompt later), CFG which controls how closely your image follows the model/loras, and each lora has its own slider too.

And every time you run an iteration with the models and the loras and the sliders and the helper programs it costs more buzz. And you tend to do that a lot, because the dopamine response when you get a usable image out of all that mess is pretty good. And even if you don't get exactly what you want from an image, you sometimes get images that you can save and use for future projects.

So you can see how it's VERY easy to spend more money on the cheaper models, and have a great time doing it. I know I have.  But there's another expense as well: time. It takes a lot of time to generate those iterations, to write and rewrite prompts, to figure out which loras/sliders/helper programs to use.

The near one-and-done nature of Flux and the other programs are matched or even outmatched in price by the cheaper models, to get an often inferior image, and they take a LOT more time.

Mind you, you can still play with the sliders and the prompts with the more expensive models to get just the result you want, or some approximation of it, but you don't HAVE to in order to get a usable image. But it will cost more money. And you can save all that money and more importantly, time and use it for stuff like... writing fiction.

But there's one reason I stick to Civitai. And that's the lack of censorship. Every other AI art service I have tried, it feels like wrestling an octopus to create NSFW or even NSFW-adjacent artwork. On Civitai if I want a ballgag or a blowjob or even a woman dressed in a skimpy thong, I can ask for it, and Civitai will attempt to deliver it. When I wanted to get a ballgagged woman on Leonardo or Tensor Art (don't even talk to me about MageSpace!) I'd have to describe the woman as having a ball in her mouth, not a ball gag. Then I'd have to draw in the straps, if I got anything close to looking right. Sigh.

Civitai is the place to go if you want to do NSFW or even NSFW-adjacent stuff.

In my next post I'll talk more about the censorship that threatens to engulf the AI art world.

Sunday, March 22, 2026

I Fluxed Up!

...and I'm so glad I Fluxed up! This is an image I created on Civitai from a Second Life scene using Flux2 Dev. It is one of about half a dozen of relatively high intelligence artificial intelligence art creation programs that Civitai offerse for higher prices than other programs, but creating much better quality results. How much better? See my original below:

This is the original Second Life image I used. It's a pretty good Second Life image, but it's NOTHING compared to the Flux 2 image. Still, i wasn't really satisfied with the image at the top, it was wonderful, but it wasn't perfect. So I tried three more Flux 2 iterations and got this which is damn near perfect:

Medieval village, people in the background, realistic mountains in the distance, it all checks out. Took two more iterations to get here. I could wish the the collar looked less plastic-y and dog collar-y. I could wish the gag, though clearly a gag, looked a little more like a regular panel gag, but it's not bad at all. But I'm not about to drop 50 yellow buzz for something that minor.

Tomorrow I'll tak about the economics of using buzz, it's a surprisingly interesting topic.

Saturday, March 21, 2026

Hypnotic War Machine Outside The Wire Man From Planet X: Four Quick SF Movie Reviews


Sadly, this scene does not appear in any of the movies listed here.

Copyright 2026 by Pat Powers

Thought I’d do something a little different today: I’ll review four recent SF movies I watched because I watched them and have opinions on them and don’t want to just dump them in social media soup and let them dissolve in the bubbling mess.

One proviso I would like to make: my wife and I watched all these movies at home, tablets in hand. These are not films that reward or require the full attention of an adult capable of reading and understanding this blog’s contents. Have something on hand to fill in as you watch.

Hypnotic

The 2023 Ben Affleck movie “Hypnotic” (directed by Robert Rodriguez) was a fun watch, but not for the reasons you might expect. It’s a thriller about a secret government agency that works with people with extraordinary mind control powers. Wheels revolve within wheels, nothing is as it seems and reality gets bent and broken all over the place. It sounds like a very X-men comic books story but it’s not.

It’s actually straight up pulp science fiction from the 1950s and 60s, when psychic powers were a popular topic and the Cold War made secret government conspiracies a popular subject. Science fiction was so full of such stories that the had a name for it: “psi-fi.” They were represented by novels like George O. Smith’s “Highways in Hiding,” Alfred Bester’s “The Demolished Man” (probably the bester of the lot) John Wyndham’s “The Chysalids” and Wilson Tucker’s “Wild Talents.” I really enjoyed thinking of the movie as a retro throwback to 1950s psi-fi as I watched it. It’s an OK SF film with a fun plot if you don’t think about it too hard, which describes a LOT of psi-fi. Check it out, it’s on HBOMAX I think.

War Machine

What if Jack Reacher and some of his Army buddies had to fight an alien mech from Mechwarrior while on a training missing in the woods?

That is the essential question posed by “War Machine” and it answers it in fine style with an action-adventure SF story that is tons of fun if you don’t think about the plot too hard, and why would you with all the fighting and shooting going on? There’s a little too much screen time devoted to showing the importance of Ritchson carrying wounded people long distances on his back (especially his brother) but it’s a minor quibble. This is a fine SF B-movie (with an A-movie budget, the Mech CGI is topnotch) that makes for a fine watch.

Outside The Wire (2021)

This is a movie set in a near-future where vaguely humanoid robots called “gumps” routinely fight with actual human soldiers in -get this- a future war in which the Soviet Union has invaded Ukraine! Wow! (The movie was released in 2011, the Russian invasion of Crimea happened in 2012, so you have to figure it won the Bad Timing Award at the Oscars that year.)

The Russians and the Ukrainian resistance and the Americans are all very interested in controlling the nukes that the Russians have carelessly left scattered all over Ukraine. Damson Idris plays a disgraced drone pilot who is secretly (as in unknown to him and his superiors) assigned to accompany an android that looks exactly like an actual human only its faster, stronger, etc., than human (played by Anthony Mackie) on a mission to prevent a Ukrainian gangster bad guy from getting his hand on a nuke.

There’s tons of factional fighting as everyone scrambles to get the nuke that involves lots of running very fast and fighting and shooting, but at least nobody has to lug his brother long distances. Lots of deception and people not being who they seem to be, too. I found it a fine one-time watch, though as usual thinking too hard about the plot (as in, at all) is not a good idea.

One thing that was fun to think about is the way the movie actually turned out to be prescient about the Ukraine war. They totally failed to get the nature of the war right (in the movie the Ukrainian government does not survive, the war is the Soviet Army vs. Ukrainian organized resistance fighters (think Afghanistan) with the Americans drone fighting everybody randomly from bases surrounded by wire fences. There are drones who are definitely part of the war, but not the major defense that they are in real life, and of course the movie robots don’t look much like the remote-controlled robots actually in use in Ukraine. But still.

I’d say this was a pretty good SF war movie. I was surprised to see it had such a low Rotten Tomatoes score for the movie from both critics and audience members. Not that I care. I liked it.

The Man From Planet X

The Man From Planet X was a pretty good idea for an SF movie that was severely marred by having a $47,000 budget that would barely have covered a high school play production. The producers worked that $47K like a mule in the tradition of Brit SF movie and TV show producers, but it only got so far.

The cool idea behind this story is that a planet is approaching and a spacecraft from said planet chooses to land on the lonely, remote moors of a lonely, remote fog-shrouded island. A visitor from said planet shows up and traipses around in a spacesuit and there are attempts to communicate with him that do not go well. A bad guy played by William Schallert (some of the very, very old among you may remember him as Dobie Gillis’ teacher in the US TV series “The Many Loves of Dobie Gillis”) wants to get the formula for the super light steel-like element the man from Planet X has too much of and that’s about it for the plot that I can vouch for.

That’s because the movie was so slow-paced and dull that it snuck up and knocked my wife unconscious like she’d been clubbed with a two by four. Realizing that I might be next, leaving us defenseless from alien invaders, I hastily turned it off because I absolutely did not give a rat’s ass what happened next to the man from Planet X. The movie ran for just 70 minutes, but it felt more like it had a three-hour runtime. There was just way too much staring anxiously into the fog-shrouded moors. In fact, if there was an award for Entertainment Featuring Staring Anxiously Into Fog-Shrouded Moors, this movie would have won it, beating even The Hound of Baskervilles.

The reviews of this movie claim it is now regarded as a classic, a cult favorite that had great atmosphere (see: fog-shrouded moors) and a good story. Well you could have fooled me. This is one cult I am in no danger of joining, because this is a movie that not even having a tablet to look at can save.

Friday, March 20, 2026

Pleasing the Crowd

Slavegirls often take sensuous pleasure in being bound.

Everyone applauded as she stood there, cumming repeatedly as the dildo in her pussy worked its magic. It was the greatest standing orgasm ovation ever!

Image source: Kink.com video 29542, "Horny Slut Can't Stop Fucking Herself" starring Cameron Dee.

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Cumming to a realization...

The "whatcha gonna do with me now that I'm all naked and tied up, big boy?" expression.

The Face When a gay-for-pay pornstar realizes she LOVES being fucked by women.

 Image source: Kink.com video 38525, "When the Cat's Away, Slutty Slaves Play" starring Dee Williams (spread wide) and Bella Rossi (wearing strap-on). The caption is not based on any knowledge about the personal lives of Dee or Bella, just that expression on Dee's face -- lust wonderfully commingled with surprise. Her huge, expressive eyes are almost glowing... great bondage imagery.