Leonardo AI Motion 2.0 Don't Need No Steenkin' Gravity!

This is how it started. A practically naked Second Life avatar ;photographed in a shallow stream with a luxurious jungle background. It's one of the best Second Life pics I've taken, although the avatar is, well, kinda bug-eyed. But such nice water, such nice jungle foliage, and such nice tanned breasts and a pussy barely covered by a waistcloth. 

So of course I HAD to run it through Leonardo AI and see what I got. What I got was eight iterations that are pretty darned close to this one. A great image, transformed the bug eyes into human eyes that are only slightly wonky, and really creates a lifelike jungle background. The stream is more realisitic than the Second Life stream but lacks the transparency of the SL version and still looks kinda AI-generated. And the more naturalistic hair just isn't as pretty as the SL avatar's hair. Worst of all, it Leonardo put that stupid bikini or one like it on every iteration and shrank those big, beautiful breasts down to a "nice rack" and gave us a granny bikini in place of that tiny wisp of silk. Still, it kept the nice skin tones and made the body more human. But what would happen if I gave it motion?

This happened. Here was my prompt: "Woman rises gracefully from stream, swirling water around her as she dances joyfully, camera slowly panning to reveal lush jungle." This video is clearly nothing like what I asked for. It's as if I asked for, "Woman lying in water is slowly pulled into the air by an invisible force, then is suddenly launched upward at high speed, driving the camera underwater somehow, then the camera resurfaces and see her flung into the trunk of a tall palm tree, then ragdolling as she falls toward the ground." VERY imaginative but it sure as hell wasn't what I asked for. Clearly, Leonardo AI does not understand gravity. Or much of anything in this instance.

Couldn't let it rest there, or course. Tried again with the same image using this prompt hoping to gentle things down: "Woman smiles, waves, then gently dips her hand in the stream. Camera slowly zooms in, focusing on her joyful expression." As you can see it worked a LOT better though I'm unsure why. Probably just random AI malarkey. I do wish the AI hadn't uglified the face, the face on this one is worse than the SL avatar toward the end, though much more human-looking. Lesson learned, whatever it was! 

Sometimes Wishes Get Rewarded

I'm not sure what it is about this photo ... maybe the casual pose and come-hither look, and the way the 3/4 pose of her head makes her nose look even snubbier than it actually is, or it COULD be the chains, but ... damn!
This is Jakki Degg, who started out as a very popular page 3 girl in England and has gone on to become a general professional model, successful enough to put out her own calendar every year. I came across this photo while doing a search for someone else, and was knocked over by her facial beauty, not to mention her sleek bod.

WJakki is no stranger to bondage gear.
The bondage itself is simple in the pic below, which is the finest bondage image I'vwe seen from the mainstream in quite a while. Degg's wrists are secured behind her back by black tape. But it's the pose that really makes this pic: Degg is stark naked, kneeling, her face pressed against the floor, her butt in the air, gazing at the camera with that gorgeous face of hers bearing a hot come-hither look. Considering Degg's stunning beauty, it's one hell of a great bondage image. And the thing is, it's not at all unusual for models and/or celebrities who don't ordinarily do bondage imagery to do the occasional bondage-oriented shot. In fact, I would imagine it's fairly rare to find a top fashion model out there who HASN'T done at least one image of herself tied up, cuffed or chained.

Jeebus! Oh, to be behind her with my hands on her hips and ...
But when these models do their bondage shots, it's almost always very weak imagery. The bondage is often sloppy, verging on being loosies. But most of all, the poses are most often typical fashion model poses, with the model stretched out and looking very comfortable. They rarely look submissive, much less posed in ways that suggest they are presenting. (A term used to describe primate females who are posing in ways that invite males to have sex with them.) Even more rarely do they pose in ways that both constitute presenting and are submissive.

But sometimes, you do get lucky.