A "shocking" steamy sexual bondage scene from the Netflix favorite, "365 Days."
This is about as wild as it gets on Netflix.
In which I become the 4,263,769th writer to weigh in on "What's Wrong With Netflix"
There
has been a lot of theorizing about what might have gone wrong with
Netflix that has caused them to have the Earth-shattering minimal dip
in subscriptions that they recently reported, causing them to have a
35 percent drop in market capitalization because investors are
flighty idiots. (Not that I blame them, I’d be nervous too if I had
two nickels to rub together in this ghoulish Late Stage Capitalism
nightmare economy.)
Anyway,
I want to get in on this whole theorizing thing myself, because I
think I have a theory that is more all-encompassing than most other
theories, which tend to run along the lines of “Netflix is failing
because it isn’t making the kind of movies/shows I like any more.”
My theory is more theoretical, more all-encompassing, explaining why
Netflix fails to make or buy engaging content for its subscribers most of the time.
My
theory is that the Netflix execs, the producers, the showrunners, the
directors, set designers and decorators, costume designers and the
writers are all members of the Professional Managerial Class (or PMC)
or are at least PMC wannabes.
First
of all, what do I mean by PMC glasses? I mean the people who make
Netflix productions see the world from the viewpoint of one of the
top 10 percent of American society, or world society. They are the
affluent, the comfortable, the successful. They aren’t angry about
anything. They aren’t upset about anything. They may have their
causes and their viewpoints, but they’re comfortable causes and
comfortable viewpoints.
And
I’m not claiming that all these people being members of the PMC
class or PMC wannabes is the result of any conspiracy. No one
deliberately gave all those jobs to people just because they were PMC class members. Instead they
gave people who are successful in film and television money,
plenty of it, enough to propel them into the PMC class. By the time
they got to the point where they were cutting deals with Netflix,
they had been successful for a while. Members in good standing of the PMC class.
That’s
why Netflix comedies aren’t funny. To be really funny, humor needs
an edge provided by anger, by outsider outrage, which is generally in
short supply among the very comfortable PMC class.
For
example, one of the most successful, if not the most successful
offerings on Netflix recently was “Don’t Look Up!” in which a
planet-killer asteroid approaching Earth is an obvious stand-in for
the climate crisis. It is edgy it is angry it is full of the sort of
stuff that PMC types might find disturbing, looking at politics,
politicians, the military and the media with a very hard, cynical
eye. It has a downbeat ending and it portrays the mighty on Earth as
a bunch of self-obsessed, greedy idiots who are too busy money
grubbing and power grabbing to save themselves.
“Don’t
Look Up!” would seem prove me wrong, except it had some outsider
outrage going from David Sirota who co-wrote the script with director
Adam McKay. Sirota was a senior advisor to Bernie Sanders’ 2020
Presidential campaign, and prior to “Don’t Look Up” was
primarily known as a leftie commentator. He wasn’t a
Marxist-Leninist, but he could fairly be described as a Social
Democrat like Bernie Sanders.
It
was Sirota’s leftist outrage over climate change and his in-depth
knowledge of the duplicity of the media and politics that made the
barbs sharp and nasty. The instincts of most
PMC types would be to moderate the anger and the rage, replacing it
with merely clever wordplay and very broad satire, leaving “Don’t
Look Up!” in the vicinity of funny. Sirota’s knowledge and anger
kept it right on target.
This
rarely happens on Netflix, and I think that’s what makes the
service dull. Once Netflix started getting up to 100 million
subscribers, its major preoccupation became finding entertainment
that wouldn’t offend its enormous base, rather than entertainment
that would make them glad they were subscribers.
This
impulse, combined with the PMC goggles that want to make everything
look comfortable and safe makes everything dull and uninteresting. The
comedies aren’t funny (lookin’ at you, “Yes Day” “Bad Trip”
and “Starsky and Hutch”) the romances aren’t all that romantic
and definitely not sexy (lookin’ at you, all of Netflix’s recent
romcoms) and the action/adventure stuff is vigorous and active but
not at all compelling (lookin’ at you “Red Notice,” and “Eagle
Eye”) and sometimes they’re just godawful (lookin’ at you
“Spenser Confidential”).
The
sexuality stuff is also indicative. They can’t even match softcore
porn in their sex scenes. It’s all ladylike porn, if you know what
I mean. There are a lot of articles on the Internet about movies and
shows that have porny scenes and content, and I’ve watched some of
them, and they’re a bunch of nothingburgers compared to actual
porn. They’re not porny, they’re kinda sorta in a way pornish, at
best.
Do
an image search of such notably “porny” movies and shows as “365
Days,” “Bridgerton,” and “Sex Education” if you like,
you’ll see what I mean if you’re familiar with actual porn.
There’s not much of it, it’s underlit, and most of the good parts
get blacked out. It’s PMC porn, in short, nothing to offend someone
too much and yet give them the impression that they saw something
sexy.
The
problem is, the PMC vision doesn’t “see” the vast majority of
Netflix subscribers, who are definitely not part of the PMC class.
They don’t connect with their subscribers psychologically,
intellectually or emotionally. Netflix’s PMC types may have some
demographic data, but they have no idea who their subscribers are are
or how they live, other than “not as well as me.”
So
the PMC types turn out generic stuff that doesn’t really interest
their subscribers. The bland, comfortable stuff that suits the PMC
vision doesn’t work for the angry, increasingly impoverished bulk
of Americans locked in alienating, dead-end jobs that bore them and
which they hate, while also taking great pleasure in gaming and
social media of various sorts that the PMC types typically do not
understand well.
If
Netflix and its content providers wanted to appeal to their actual
audience, if they could actually SEE them, they’d have more
characters who were out-of-touch seniors doing and saying stupid
things. They’d have more characters who were horrible corporate
bosses making their employees’ lives miserable. They’d have more
characters who were lovable slackers outwitting their horrible bosses
and having sex with all the pretty girls and making the lives of
those around them more rewarding, though generally not in monetary
ways.
Climate
change would be a huge theme in a lot of stories. Housing would be a
theme, mostly not being able to get it. The way the PMC and the
oligarchs rip off middle class and poor people would be a steady
background theme to the stories, and often the main theme.
Homeless
people would be portrayed as people, not drugged-out zombies. And
most people would be living in cramped apartments, often with
roommates to make paying the rent possible. And the struggle to keep
the rent paid would be a much bigger thing.
PMC
types would say such stories are boring and distressing, not the sort
of thing people want to watch to be entertained. But the real truth
is that the “people” they’re describing are the PMC class,
because they can’t see the rest of us, and don’t want to.
And
they would really HATE stories about how they economically oppress
everyone else except their oligarch masters, and which detail how
horribly managers treat employees as a group, because they
instinctively dislike any story that reveals just how much better off
their lives are than those of the middle class and poor people they
systematically oppress.
So
Netflix, its management and content creators consisting only of PMC
types, don’t show these things or anything like them. They have
shows about wealthy people, often members of the PMC class and
oligarchs who lead “interesting” lives. Even when they portray
members of the poor and middle class they do so through PMC lenses.
The middle class and poor people on Netflix live in housing that is
much nicer than real middle class and poor people could ever afford.
They generally wear clothing and have possessions that are nicer than
most middle class and poor people can afford. In fact, they tend to
live like upper middle class and lower upper class people do – PMC
types pretending to be poor and middle class, in short.
When
Netflix does attempt a realistic or gritty depiction of poor or
middle class people, they tend to go way too dark. For example
“Hillbilly Elegy”is a gritty depiction of how tough people in
Appalachian mountain country have it. It was presented in the
PMC-controlled mainstream media as a sympathetic portrayal of
Appalachian mountain people. But
very quickly reviews came out saying that the movie was actually
poverty porn, focusing only on the miseries of the Appalachian poor,
creating a misleading view of who they were as people. Even when the
PMC types are looking hard at the middle class and the poor, they
cannot see them as they are.
Wouldn’t
pay them to, you know.
I
hope I haven’t given you the impression that the PMC are conspiring
to exclude and misrepresent the poor and the middle class. It’s
just a case of shared interests leading to a shared vision, one of
those unwritten cultural things that’s invisible and would be
denied by most members of the PMC.
But
there are some members of the PMC who do intentionally lie and
mislead about the economic oppression of the poor and middle class.
Academics and media people often know enough to know that the wealth
of the oligarchs comes from the economic oppression of the poor and
middle class, but you’ll never hear it from their commentating and
the media enterprises they work for.
And
if PMC commentators do somehow attempt to tell a progressive message,
especially on political or economic topics, they are very rapidly
fired. For example, when MSNBC hired Dylan Rattigan, Krystal Ball, Ed
Schultz and Cenk Uygar to give a progressive “edge” to their
coverage, then fired them all when it turned out they
had spines.
How
does this all relate to Netflix’s woes? Netflix, with its hundreds
of millions of subscribers and its PMC staff and oligarch management
can’t see its subscribers, and by “see” I mean understand.
What’s more, they don’t WANT to see their subscribers. What they
really want to do is feed the subscribers bland, feel-good escapism
and works that support the status quo, even when they claim to be
edgy, challenging work.
(That’s
why Netflix, and ALL the streaming media are so ecstatically happy
with comic book movies. Movies about spandex-clad idiot good guys
flying around and foiling the plans of spandex-clad idiot bad guys
are just the pablum they want to serve to subscribers to keep them
docile and unaware.)
This
is why virtually all the entertianment options on Netflix rouse only
half-hearted interest among subscribers, if they rouse any interest
at all. Netflix and every streaming service and cable provider would
LOVE to provide entertainment that will have audiences absolutely
rapt over what they’re watching and eager for more. Many may
actually believe they are doing just that. Some people do love a lot
of Netflix productions. And some of them are good. (“Don’t Look
Up!” “The Witcher” “Stranger Things” “Travelers” and
some others.) But generally they’re a drop in the bucket compared
to the huge swirling mass of mediocrity that is most of Netflix’s
(and most other streaming services’) productions.
There’s
a reason for that. Netflix’s content isn’t made for us. It’s
made by PMC people, for PMC people, though many of them think they
are making shows for us. They aren’t. That’s why they aren’t
any good. They’re not supposed to be good. They’re supposed to be
tranquilizers. Soma. And they are. Netflix’s collection of merely
tolerable films isn’t a bug. It’s a feature.
See
you at work tomorrow, bright and early!
Just for the record, this is actual steamy bondage sex.
Image source: Carissa Montgomery in Kink Shoot 35037, "Big Tit Milf in Extreme Bondage."