AI Art Programs And Malicious Compliance

Let's talk about AI blunders in NSFW art.

My DeviantArt fans need to know just how hard it is to get usable NSFW art out of Civitai and other AI art programs. Let me make it clear: I an using Civitai because it is by far the best platform for creating NSFW images, IMHO. That's because it is virtually the ONLY platform that allows model and lora creators to develop models and loras to create NSFW images. Deviant Art is not interested in policing creators beyond not allowing them to create outright illegal art.

Here we are. Naked. Gagged. Bound. Vibrator on/in pussy. But also, three hands. Foot from nowhere. Two out of three hands hoplessly mangled. A fairly common result when you seek to create NSFW images.

But since Civitai is the platform I use, it's the source of most of my blunders. It's not the fault of censorship deliberately blocking NSFW imagery as it is on other sites, it's the fault of models and loras that just don't quite get all the little details right.

This is the sort of image that makes me use the term "malicious compliance." Woman being proneboned on a bed while bound and gagged. Face and gag beautifully done. Cock entering woman's butt at the right angle. Wonderfully done! Until you notice the man's forearm has merged with the woman'd upper arm. She's also been given ANOTHER right arm that is tied to a big chunk of flesh that goes... nowhere? What the hell? It's like they gave the image all the sexy I asked for, but didn't bother with details like... arms. And hands. 

More malicious compliance. Beautifully done image of a slavegirl in bondage being anally fucked. A few tiny mistakes: rope that disappears behind the guy's cock, the whole wrist bondage thing, but maybe fixable. But then what the hell is that black plastic thing in her anus that he's sticking his cock into? I don't know, and I don't WANT to know! 

It's a naked, bound woman giving a blowjob allright, but it's three-breasted, three-armed Suzy Longtorso! With a pink vibrator on her chin!

I decided at some point to go for something completely different, so I asked for a happy, healthy, naked native tribe having an orgy in a jungle clearing while spaceships flew overhead. Jungle: check! Spaceships: check! Orgy: I got a bunch of naked Europeans including Suzy Longleg and some background people that don't bear looking at, standing around like they've just been discovered and are posing for a photo. Orgy: none. Of course!  

The only point of this post is to let my Deviant Art fans know about all the winnowing and work we have to do to create a winner. Totally worth it when we do, though.

Why You Shouldn't Let AI Agents Run Your Finances

 
This is why. AI Art created by me.

When I created this image, I believe using Civitai, my prompt called for a beautiful naked woman tied spreadeagled to a bed. I did not mention straightjackets at all. Nor did I mention four-legged spider women wearing straightjackets at all. I did ask for the image to be created in pulp magazine art style. At least it got that right.

I bring this up because I recently saw an article with a headline that said, "Don't Let AI Agents Run Your Finances." I wholeheartedly agree.  I say this as a person who enjoys working with AI, both AI art programs and AI agents like Gemini and ChatGPT and have found them to be VERY useful in learning AI art sites like Tensor Art, Leonardo AI, Mage Space and Civitai. But they have some serious flaws. Like, I don't know how many hours I have wasted learning to use a new website with the help of ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, searching for widgets and features that no longer exist, pages that are no longer at the location the AI thinks they are at,  etc. 

In my experience, AI gets things right most of the time, but still, it gets things wrong REGULARLY. It's not a rare phenomenon at all. In my case, the stakes are low. If AI is wrong about software or a website's structure, I can just go back and ask a few pointed questions and get back on the track, most of the time.

But if you're just letting some AI agent run your finances, you are Asking For It and you will Surely Get It, because the mistakes made by AI finance agents can ruin you economically. You might instruct it to invest the bulk of your money in a stable investment portfolio that earns a good return, and then discover that the AI agent has taken a flyer on a Squiddly Straightjacket Woman NFT Coins for reasons known only to its AI LLM, a coin that immediately tanked, taking all your investment earnings with it. And you can't get that money back, there's no reset button on financial mistakes. (Yeah, there are lawsuits but they take forever and often don't succeed (did you read the fine print?) 

I suspect anyone who has actually worked with AI will tell you the same. And yeah, I'm sure the more advanced versions of the AI programs might not make as many mistakes as the freebie AI that I use, but I still think it's foolish to risk all your moolah on even the very best version of an AI finance agent.

Another very wrong image of a woman tied spreadeagled to a bed. I have a whole folder full of blunders like this. It happens REGULARLY.

Civitai, Tensor AI, MageSpace, Leonardo AI: Blunderers All

WARNING: This image is safe for work in every respect yet still is an AI blunder. All the images below it are Not Safe For Work and also Not Safe For Life in some cases. You have been warned.

MageSpace: This is Schrodinger's blunder: it is and is not a blunder, both at the same time. In the sense that the artwork on this image is well executed with no glaring issues, it's not a blunder. The problem is that this is an image to image creation, and the image it was supposed to be based on was a lot like this image in every respect, except the woman in the foreground is naked and has her back turned to the viewer, mostly, as she watches the dirigible float past. So it is a blunder in that sense. This is very symptomatic of MageSpace, which HATES nudity. There are ways to get around it (image to image) but it's very difficult at best. Don't even think about generating sexy art with prompts on MageSpace.

Civitai: When Civitai goes bad, it goes BAAAAD. It gets naked women in bondage all wrong in so many ways. I forget what image this is based on, but whatever it was, it didn't look a THING like this THING. What I find particularly ironic here is that Civitai is particularly bad with portraying gags (most AI art programs are) but in this case it did a pretty good job of rendering the ball part of the ballgag but then rendered the face around it in the most horrifying manner possible.

Tensor AI: Tensor is censored like all the AI programs right now. It's very hard to get good, clean, naked image out of it. Monstrosities like Spiderwoman here are fairly common. One hopes things will get better soon, but who knows with the right wing in power and censoring every fucking thing they can?

Leonardo AI: Leonardo AI is just plain cruel. It'll get your hopes up by producing an image of a bonnie lass with a smiling face on a sofa by a river and then... and then... you look at her breasts and notice that she has no nipples. And you look at her belly and notice that she has two bellybuttons, neither of them anywhere close to where they should be, which is hidden behind her forearm. Speaking of hidden things, her left hand has COMPLETELY disappeared into the cushion, which doesn't look all THAT soft. But perhaps that's a blessing in disguise, because her right hand which IS visible has some very wonky fingers. But then you notice the absolute worst, which is that the shin and foot of her left leg have somehow merged with the sofa's curlicue gilt backing. It is amazing how Leonardo AI can take such a beautiful image and utterly ruin it with one awful detail after another.

All AI art programs appear to have their weaknesses. I'm sure the art creators who present flawless image after flawless image are chest deep in culled images of the sort I'm showing you, which they are not showing you because they want you to believe they are AI art whizbangs. That's the nature of AI art, you have to cull a lot of dross to get the good stuff, and if AI art is an indicator for AI in general, we don't have to worry about AI matching human intelligence anytime soon. Much less superintelligence.