So This Is My Life Now

"So this is my life now, naked, bound and sucking on strangers' cocks. Well at least it's better than that gig I had as President Trump's press spokesperson."

Image source: Rain DeGrey (and parts of Owen Gray) in kink.com shoot 34695.

Leonardo AI Walks The Dinosaur Just For Fun

This is how it started, an image created in Second Life. Found a jungle set with a tyrannosaur and posed an avatar in front of it and took some pix. Came out great, pure B-movie excitement! Would work as sweat mag art too. But I thought I'd make a video from it.

The AI did a pretty good job overall with everything except of course the armbinder. That was shiny metal in the original, but somehow Leonardo wanted to turn the metal into soft, breathable fabric in every iteration. But at least the bondage gear was still there. I actually wrote 'with her wrists cuffed behind her back" because cuffs sounds like it could be crime or adventure related, not necessarily a bad evil awful sex thing. And it worked, except when I converted it to motion...

My prompt for all four videos was something close to this: "A woman with her arms cuffed behind her back sees a tyrannosaur. She spins and runs toward the camera with her hands still cuffed behind her back, screaming in terror, with the tyrannosaur chasing her." 

This is the best of the four videos I made. In each and every case, as soon as the woman spins around her armbinder magically disappears or morphs into cloth armbands that don't hinder her arm movements at all. She's pumping those arms as she runs. Screaming too. 

Also, our heroine is stark naked in the initial Second Life pic. And Leonardo AI kept her stark naked in the still image it created of her. But on each and every video they put a bikini on her. When it's that consistent, it's gotta be censorship. Great. Censorship is why I stopped my Kling subscription.

But you know what? Bad as it is, my video is more exciting and lifelike than almost every stop motion dinosaur scene from the 1920s to the 1960s. People who think CGI isn't great stuff for SF movies are just crazy. How can you not see how much better modern movies look than the absolute CRAP we got for SF movie special effects and props in the old days? I remember watching "Quatermass and the Pit" which had a pretty good script and solid acting, for the most part, and just laughing when the body of one of the Martians was an obvious two-meter long plastic replica of a cricket. So pathetic.

And of course those old movies had budgets ranging from tens of thousands of dollars to millions, with most somewhere in the hundreds of thousands. You know what I could do with a budgets of a hundred thousand dollars and my present gear? I could spend a hundred bucks on video production and $99,900 on hookers and blow, that's what!

I know how Hollywood accounting works.  

First there was sub frenzy...

First, there was sub frenzy. Now there's cock madness! It can affect any sub, anyhere, anytime. A proximity to a cock causes the sub's brain to short circuit as she is flooded with (echo effect) FEMALE HORMONES. Most common symptom is inability to control facial expressions at the sight of a cock.  Call your doctor if a cock madness spell lasts more than four hours, and brag about it.

 

Image source: kink.com shoot 22061, starring Katherine Case and Derrick Payne.

The Product Every Slave Girl Loves!

Image source: a talented artist I know who would prefer to remain anonymous.

It's Panti Helper, with the taste slavegirls love! Panti Helper turns panties into a nutritious, satisfying, tasty meal. It's filled with carbohydrates, oils, proteins and far fewer insect parts than you might reasonably expect! Panti Helper,, your slavegirl will be begging to be pantie-gagged just to recall the taste of Panti Helper! 

Pet Shop Slave Girls Dancing Video by Leonardo AI: Now With Inception

Feel free to get a copy of "The Pet Shop Girls Trilogy" by clicking on this text!

I realized that although the Pet Shop display window wouldn't work for a book cover, they still might work for promo art. So I took a display window and created art to scale. My idea was to make a video of it. But before I could use the image to make a video, I had to run it through Leonardo AI to use it. Nothing could go wrong here!

I made 24 different iterations of my artwork and every fucking one of them was fucked up to one extent or another. And I mean, fucked up badly. Mostly they fucked up Susan, but they managed to fuck up Katie and Nataly's faces, too, in many cases. They also put extra bikinis on all of them except Susan, who got confused-looking clothes in every iteration. The only thing it consistently got right in all iterations was the "Please Buy Me" text which was embedded in the image before I ran it through Leonardo. Lesson learned. This is the image I used to create my video because at least it had a nude if Caucasian Katie in it. What would Leonardo AI do here?

Talk about breaking the Fourth Wall... this video breaks the First Window! My prompt was "Three women dance slinkily in a display window for watchers." Simple as can be. But Leonardo AI had to tansform the slinky dancing into a pillow fight. What an interesting approach! It also had Nataly break through the window while the sidewalk did some Inception stuff and the watchers appear to join in the whatever-it-is when Nataly appears among them. And it put a bra on Katie, of course. It was a lot more than I asked for, and in fact it wasn't at all what I asked for, but it's what I got. Fortunately I made two other videos that worked a LEETLE better. More about them, later.

You Can Still Get The Pet Shop Girls Trilogy For $2.99 Today!

The Leonardo art the video below is based on. She's totally amazed that my book is still on sale!

"Oh my goodness, I can still buy it for $2.99? I better get moving!" (Link to buy!)

My prompt for this image created for the video was "A woman hops across a stage with her hands held at shoulder level as if surrendering." What I got was not what I asked for, but it's still pretty damned good! 

Now, About That Cover For the Pet Shop Girls Trilogy -- Leonardo AI Hits And Misses

 
Here's the cover of "The Pet Shop Girls Trilogy," for reference. Click on it to get the book!

I knew what I wanted when I stared out making the cover for TPSGT (The Pet Shop Girls Trilogy). I had three slavegirls featured in my stories and I wanted images of the three of them looking sexy and naked on the cover. So I went to the folders where I built the covers of the three novels that make up TPSGT and looked for images I could use. The images all started out as Second Live avatars, here they are, for the record:

The Second Live avatar that Katie was based on.

The Second Life avatar Nataly was based on.

The Second Live avatar Susan was based on. Note the ropes. They're supposed to be a rope bondage version of a bitch suit, but they didn't really work.

Here are the three Leonardo AI images I was able to create using the avatars:

Here's Katie all AI'd up, and damn what an improvement. I ran quite a few iterations to get this image, and I'm so glad I stuck with it. I love the result here, especially that beaming smile. The face in general is a huge improvement. And the breasts are very nice indeed, mostly because of that smooth honey brown skin she has. I was glad to have a person of color because the other two characters were very Caucasian-looking and I had no problem at all with Katie being brown. Hell yes!

Nataly didn't change much except she got a lot more human looking and a lot less cartoonish-looking. Her ugly, lumpy shoulders got smoothed out. Her skin and hair improved. The only problem area was the ballgag. It didn't come out right on ANY of my iterations. (This image is Photoshopped. I drew a circle around the confused ballgag parts and borrowed the ballgag from a porn photo and then did some tedious editing to get it just right.)

Nataly's Leonardo AI version was incredible. Most especially that facial expression. Leonardo took the apprehensive expression on the SL avatar and converted to a lost, haunted expression. Her eyes are incredibly expressive. Even MORE amazing, the collar came out OK and the ballgag improved! Almost always, Leonardo AI will fuck up ballgags big time, and they almost always turn a collar into a necklace that looks nothing like the collar. Also, the tail is much improved, with the color and texture matching Susan's hair. And even the shape of the tail was much improved. Only problem was the ropes, which Leonardo AI interpreted as lacy, frilly woman things. I can't even blame Leonardo for that. The ropes on the SL avatar are not especially well done, a weakness of SL physics. I thought about hand drawing ropes but I wound up saying the words that so many artists have: "Fuck it. It'll do." I mean, yeah, she does appear to have lace growing out of one armpit, but whachagonnado? (That's why you need real artists if you can afford them, boys and girls. When they say "fuck it!" it's over something a non-artist would not notice.)

Next I needed something to tie the three images together visually. My first track was, since they were Pet Shop slavegirls, they could be posing in a Pet Shop window, trying to get people to buy them. I went to Deposit Photos to see if they had any Pet Store art I could use, but amazingly, the Pet Store art was about dogs and cats and stuff. Also a lot of it was vector art. I gave up after a while. I couldn't find anything I could use so after a while I stopped looking and went to my backup plan. 

Fortunately I had a backup plan, which was to use prompts to create a Pet Store exterior with display window filled with nothing (so I could paste in the girls). Unfortunately, I had a bright idea for that, which was to have a neon sign over or in the windows with the words "Please Buy Me!" glowing.

This was when I discovered how many ways there were to misspell "Please Buy Me." I had naively thought that by including the text I wanted in my prompt, the AI would use those exact letters to represent the word, "Please Buy Me." But noooooooo, instead I got every last possible misspelling of "Please Buy Me." "Pelase Buy Me" was the favorite, but also "Plase By Me," "Peals Buy Me" and ";!Ple::s Be Me." Maybe about 1 in 10 iterations had the right spelling.

There were other problems as well. I asked for an empty display space behind the window. (I did not ask for "no dogs and cats" as a negative prompt because I knew from past experience that this would only encourage Leonardo AI to give me lots of images of dogs and cats.) So I still got lots of images of dogs and cats in the "empty" display space, also people, food bowls, all kinds of pet products on shelves, and occasionally, an empty space. I went through many iterations and eventually got several images of pet shop windows with empty, or at least, mostly empty, spaces behind them that were usable.

Then I went to work pasting in the Pet Girls and that's when I ran into a more difficult problem, perspective. The AI had provided me with images of people looking in the window (because I asked for it in the prompt). They worked for my intent but there was a perspective problem. I want the images of the Pet Girls to be large, dominating the page, because I know my horny, horny readership. But the people in the foreground set the perspective, and if I made my images large they would look like giantesses. If I made them small enough to look normal next to the onlookers they would be tiny indeed, problematical since book covers are vertical spaces. 

Yeah, a really sad image that just doesn't work.

I tried arranging the Pet Girls in many configurations in several Pet Shop windows, and none of them worked. In addition to the perspective issue, there was a layering issue. I could paste the images into the window space, but there was no easy way to make them look like they were behind glass and have them dominate the page. And if it wasn't easy I wasn't about to try it! I had deadlines, dammit! So I gave up the Pet Shop window idea and did some seriously lateral thinking.

I decided to just display the three images in a generic kind of space, no window or shoppers. I soon realized that I would need some kind of background art to make the space behind the Pet Girls something other than dead space. So I thought about the kind of images you might find in a place where Pet Girls are sold. If I had been more imaginative, and had more time, I could have come up with some fairly imaginative ideas, like maybe pet girls jumping through hoops or kneeling before owners with their butts stuck out.

But I didn't have the time, I just focussed generically sexy images that might look right as the background of a human Pet Shop. And eventually I had an idea: the image most people think of as belonging in a place where very sexy things are done is a nude silhouette of a woman in a sexy pose. Lots of TV shows and movies have used this kind of art as a sign of a sexy business. 

This time I made no attempt to get the images I wanted via Leonardo AI. It fights sexy imagery hard. After writing this image I went to Leonardo AI and created images using this prompt: "A series of silhouettes of women in bikinis looking beautiful."  Here's what I got:

Yeah, "silhouette" is another word Leonardo AI clearly does not understand. Also it whiffed on the word "series." I was right, getting what I wanted from Leonardo AI would have been a bear.

So I went to Deposit Photos looking for my silhouettes and there I struck gold. They had exactly what I needed, plenty of it. I did a bit of shopping and picked a series of images that had a lot of submissive-looking poses. They were all black and white silhouettes, and I didnt want that, it would be too strong, not at all what I needed. But I knew how to fix that, I just put a golden-brown (emphasis on the "golden") layer over the silhouettes and worked the opacity of both layers until I had what I wanted. You can see it in the background of the cover art. Worked very nicely I think.

The only other element of the cover is that Katie is riding Susan. This was just a matter of cutting and pasting multiple layers of Katie on trop of Susan. It was tedious, time-consuming work but not difficult other than that, mainly because Susan and Katie's poses worked very well for a horsie ride.

That's the full story of that "easy" cover. It took a long time for me to get it finished and looking something like "right." Someday I will make enough money to hire and artist and pay them a decent price for their work. Until then, I'll continue to put huge effort into creating mediocre cover art! 

My New Book, "The Pet Shop Girls Trilogy" Now On Sale For $2.99 Plus Weird Leonardo AI Video

I said weird and I MEANT weird. This video of an amputee woman assaulting an overweight woman with her pussy was NOT what I was looking for. More on that later in this post!

My new book"The Pet Shop Girls Trilogy" is now available on Smashwords for just $2.99 for the Memorial Day weekend. You can get a copy of it here. It's 110,000 words of pure, raw sexual bondage rape energy. Here's da blurb:  

This Memorial Day I’ve put together three of my most popular stories, the Pet Shop Slave Girls stories. These are about three ordinary women living in the aftermath of the Oligarch War, which wiped out four billion people and four thousand oligarchs. During the Oligarch War the winners establish Slave Girl Pet Shops, which trains women to serve as sex slaves through a rigorous program of repeated and prolonged rape and sexual assault, as well as training in a variety of sexual activities and techniques, whether they like them or not. The training often breaks the women psychologically, which works very well for the Pet Shops but not so much for the women. After the Oligarch War the Pet Shop Slave Girls program continues, this time as a punishment for doing one of the very few things that will get you thrown off Basic Income. Susan is a war captive during the Oligarch War, a woman profoundly uninterested in war but who gets caught up in the nets nonetheless (because she’s pretty). She’s entirely innocent but that doesn’t matter at all in the rage-filled, hate-filled days of the Oligarch War in which practically everyone has lost friends and family to drone attacks. How will Susan cope with being the object of so much anger? Katie is a thief in a world where replicators can make copies of anything you like. She lets a romantic rivalry get out of hand and commits theft to assuage her feelings, only to find herself a Pet Shop Slave Girl whose feelings are assaulted along with her entire body. And now that Katie is a slave girl, her owners and trainers will control her feelings for her, along with her body. How will Katie adapt to her new circumstances? Nataly is a woman whose family were once Premies (“Premiums” as opposed to “Basics”) which is low-grade celebrity status, but who become Basic Income recipients because her father had programming skills the oligarchs found useful, then was as unemployed as everyone else when his skills, too, were automated out of existence. Her family’s fall from grace triggers a violent rage inside her, which manifests in a heartfelt attempt to beat a woman to death. She is unsuccessful and winds up in court where she is sentenced to the Pet Shop Slave Girls program. How will a violent virgin like Nataly cope with all the rape and sexual assault that is the hallmark of the Pet Shop Slave Girls program? In a very surprising way, it turns out! Now for one low price you can read all these stories, 110,000 words of what has been described as “pure, raw sexual bondage rape energy in written form.” Get the book now and find out!

Now about that video image. Here's the image I started with:

As you will know if you read yesterday's post, this is two figures from the cover of "The Pet Shop Girls Trilogy." I'll have a full post about the cover soon. But this is the image the video was based on. My prompt was "one woman gives another woman a horsie ride" because you can't give Leonardo accurate prompts when your imagery is mostly naked women. Here's what I got:

You gotta admit, that's quite different. I'm guessing the prompt the Leonardo AI "heard" was, "One-armed woman rides overweight Japanese woman whirling around and around." I was very intrigued by the fact that although the motion video fucked up the imagery left and right, it kept Japanese Susan's ball gag in place and looking like a ball gag. Leonardo's Asian woman obsession was there, because Susan does not look at all Japanese. I have no idea why Leonardo portrayed Susan as fat. I don't think Leonardo does, either.

There was a reason why I was willing to risk a two-body motion video. (Leonardo AI is bad enough at single body motion videos, when you get two bodies together most of the time Leonardo AI goes full Lovecraftian horror mode.)  There was another figure on the cover, just a single figure. This figure:

Nataly the Violent Virgin, ready to fight. I used this image, my prompt was "A woman boxer spars to warm up." Here's what I got:

Man, what a sweet video. Strikingly good. The only beef I have is that the ballgag eventually morphs into a mouth. And it's not a big deal. Just ironic considering the horrible video of Susan and Katie showed the ball gag just fine. It's the mystery of AI, I guess.

The Pet Shop Girls Trilogy: Publishing Tomorrow For The Memorial Day Weekend

Just for your information, that's Nataly the Violent Virgin at the left and Katie the Fool is riding Nataly the War Captive. This cover was a BEAR to create. More about that in another post.

Just in time for the Memorial Day Weekend, I've put my three Pet Shop Girls stories together in one volume and will be selling them for a low, low price. Even better, for Memorial Day Weekend I'm putting together an even lower sale price. (My accountant had to be revived with smelling salts when he saw the price!) 

The Ideal 1950s Wife

Betty Crocker in the kitchen, Betty Page in the bedroom.

Image sources: A couple of 1950s era grocery ads and a collared, leashed and buttplugged Charlotte Vale from one of Kink.com's old live video shows back in 2012. They were kind of kinky OnlyFans videos, but before OnlyFans was a thing. Kink.com has made videos from two of her shows, they are kink.com shoots 7857 and 7728. 

Weird Clothing Fantasy

"No, my Master forbids me to wear clothes most of the time, or to own clothes at all. I just like to come here now and then and fantasize about having laundry to do."

Nikita Bellucci in kink.com video 29353, "French Beauty Anally Fucked In Public."

Why Mainstream Media Never Gets Sex Scenes Right

Closeup from Madison's ride that hopefully won't get Google cranked up, unlike the gif just below that this image is from.

This is porn. You'll be tested on this later! This is bondage porn, not vanilla porn, which is also covered in this post. You can if you like imagine that Madison Scott's wrists are not tied to her ankles and she isn't ballgagged. If that's what works for you.

Source: Kink.com video 9799, "Taboo Teaching" featuring Madison Scott and Mark Davis.

If you watch mainstream media that deals with sex, porn and the sex industry you will soon conclude that sex is a Very Bad Thing that is Definitely NO Fun that no sane person would participate in. 

Now if you are a healthy, sane, normal adult human being who has actually had sex, your experience of sex was probably that it felt WONDERFUL, maybe the best feeling EVER. Pure pleasure, the very apotheosis if you will, of pleasure. So why does mainstream media always portray it as a bad experience? There are several reasons.

This is Holly Hunter tied to a bed in an upper spreadeagle, stark naked from the TNT television series "Saving Grace." It's one of the, if not the, raunchiest bondage images I've ever seen on broadcast cable TV. Hunter is seen like this for ten or fifteen minutes of the show. (Which is also very rare, most of the time when mainstream media shows partial nudity, it's only for a brief second or two.) It's the old "got tied up for consensual sex and then the partner leaves them tied up" scenario. Natually she's tied face down. This is BY FAR one of the raunchest mainstream media sexual images. Most are far tamer and far shorter. 

1) Mainstream media is CENSORED and CANNOT portray sex accurately. They cannot show naked human beings having sex with their genitals. While there are all sorts of reasons for censoring explicit sexual imagery, some more valid than others, the undeniable fact is that censorship prevents viewers from seeing how sex is done, preventing viewers from assessing it. 

It's actually a moot point: everyone who can have an orgasm knows what orgasms feel like, and everyone who has had sex with someone else knows what sexual intercourse feels like. Pictures of people having sex won't change their opinions either way. But if you cut out the explicit parts, you don't really show why people enjoy sex so much. The effect is that happy sexual relationships are portrayed most often without sexual imagery. It's just the nature of the beast.

A scene from "Spartacus: Gods of the Arena" shows a slavegirl being raped by Baritatus, in a television series that aired on the Starz premium channel. She's naked and collared. One of the advantages of slave girls in sex scenes is that the drama is already present: she is a slave, she has no choice about the sex, it's rape by nature. So any sex scene involving a slave is dramatic by nature, even if all that happens is apparently consensual sex.

2) Most movies (and TV shows) generally involve some conflict or other. The dramatic elements often show up in the sex scenes and generally makes them unhappy in one way or another. It's not a matter of intentionally trying to make sex look worse than it is, but overall, it has that effect. This tends to be more the case with movies and TV shows where sex is central to the plot. A movie or show about people who have a wonderful relationship with lots of happy and fulfilling sex and that's about it would be derided as porn. (It's the same reason science fiction movies and TV shows tend to be about dystopias instead of utopias. Utopias where everyone is happy and living their best lives don't tend to produce drama.) Hence, sexual relastionships that make people unhappy tend to be far more common in mainstream media than they are in real life. Once again, it's the nature of the beast, not the result of intentional censorship.

Many speculate that "Game of Thrones" would be classified as porn under Mike Lee's proposed censorship bill. Here's Emilia Clarke and Jason Momoa porning things up. Of course, most of the scenes in Game of Thrones do not involve sex and/or nudity, but censors are a VERY inclusive bunch when it comes to defining porn. 

3) Culture War Issues. Sex in media is not the cental issue of the culture wars, but it is an issue. And for the people who want to censor, it is a central issue, an issue for which they have great passion. I would not be surprised to learn that some portion, maybe a very large portion, of the people who are the most strident about censorship, like that stupid little weasel Mike Lee (Senator from Utah, Crazy) have a fetish for preventing other people from having orgasms on their own terms. He has recently proposed legislation to censor all porn, basically, all images of naked men and women, having sex of otherwise. He does this kind of shit regularly, one might also say, compulsively, without success. But the bill he's put forth is straight out of the Project 2025 playbook, so things might go differently this time. I hope not. 

My point is that if you haven't heard much about this it's not surprising. The general public isn't at all interested in censoring sexy stuff right now, they're a LOT more concerned with not being rendered homeless or unemployed by the economic antics of the current dementia-addled semi-octogenerian in chief. As they should be. But these censorship crazies never stop, because they're compelled to attempt censorship for their own freaky reasons.

Religion rears its ugly head, along with sex. NOW we're getting kinky! Image source: kink.com video 22717, "The Sins of Sister Summers" starring Angell Summers.

3) The Religion Grift. But there's more to it than weird sexual obsession with other people's orgasms. There are also cultural forces at work for censorship in America, primarily religious in nature. Catholics in league with Protestant evangelicals were responsible for the Hayes censorship era that hamstrung movies and TV shows for decades, and they still form the bulk of the cultural pressure for censorship, now with extra added Mormons as well. (Mike Lee is a Mormon, and they are censorious bunch.)

Mormons are also avid consumers of porn, like many evangelicals and Catholics. Three different religions, but they have censoriousness in common. And they all claim that they're doing it for good of others, most especially for (let's say it all together now!) "the chilllldreeeen."

This is, of course, bullshit. Not because many religious types aren't actually concerned with preventing children from being exposed to explicit sexual images, I'm sure many are, especially among the base. It's bullshit because the censorship never stops with the children, most especially if it's unopposed. Protecting the children is a wedge issue. If censorship succeeds "for the children" the goalposts are immediately moved to protecting the adults.

Religions want to censor sexual materials because most of them, at one time or another, were in a position to control the sexuality of their followers. In the case of Catholics and Protestants, you had to go through the church to get married, and that gave the church a powerful gripping hand on the libidos of young men. Especially since the church and the families REALLY pushed chastity on girls and women.

Now there were good practical reasons for this. From the Bronze Age to medieval times, a woman who had a child without having a mate was in for a hard time, in most societies.  And safe, effective birth control did not exist. So chastity was important for young women, because men wanted to be sure that the children they were providing for were in fact their own children. At the same time, a man who could impregnate a woman without having to help care for her and her children is a reproductive winner. More offspring, no costs. Which is why the general culture tends to make chastity much less important for men.

Nuns have always been a bit problematical in the Catholic faith: shouldn't they be out there having babies to further God's glory?

Image source: "Filth and Sin" kink.com video 34016 featuring Ana Foxxx and Chanel Preston.

A religion that pushes chastity on young women is therefore a good thing from the viewpoint of the parents who want their daughtrs to succeed in Bronze Age and medieval societies. It's also a good thing for the state. The state's rulerse generally wants their population to increase so they'll have more agricultural workers and soldiers to make them more wealthy and powerful. They also want their population healthy, because you get more work ($$) out of healthy subjects. They also want their population to be kinda dumb and very prone to be submissive to authority. All things the Catholics, Protestant evangelicals and the Mormons are big on. (Mormons are a bit late to the party compared to the other two religions, but they do share those traits.)

All of the religions cited are against porn, but their opposition to porn is just an effect of their desire to control the sexuality of the men and women in their charge. They want to prevent young people from getting sexually aroused and doing sexual things that the church authorities can't control. Curtailing access to porn is just a means to that end. It made sense in a time with no safe, effective birth control and harsh Bronze Age morals about women who had sex outside of marriage (thanks in large part to the church).

 The state finds the religious focus on celibacy outside marriage very useful, since it keeps the population growing and ensures that the men who become soldiers will be healthy, ignorant and conditioned to responding unthinkingly to authority. These are grifts that have been around for so long that they are not recognized as grifts. Now THAT'S a successful grift!

 With the advent of safe, reliable birth control, however, the problem of out of wedlock childbirths is greatly reduced. Not entirely eliminated, of course, because not all young women or men have sense enough to use contraception. Plus, these religions are fighting with all their might against contraception and abortion, creating all sorts of horrifying medical stories about women who need abortion for medical reasons and can't get them in red states. The religions claim that their reason is that all life is sacred to them, even as yet unborn life.

But their real reason for fighting abortion are revealed by the fact that these religions are fighting against women's access to contraception, all forms of contraception. No pill, no IUD, no condoms, no nothing. The religious justification of this is that whether or not a woman gets pregnant as a result of having sex is, and should be, a function of God's will. But the real reason is that the religious leaders want to be the ones whose will is enforced, and their will is always that the women in their charge should be pregnant at every opportunity, which creates more followers. That's all there is to it. Every religion wants more followers because that means more money and power for the leaders. All their religious claims are simple grift. (They're against porn for the same reason: men who are masturbating to porn are not impregnating women. It is possible to do both, as I personally can attest, but that's not a major consideration for religious censors.) 

When the state gets involved, autonomy about sexual choices vanishes.

Image source: Kristy Lynn and James Deen in kink.com shoot 21250, "Bribing an Officer."

4) The State Grift -- The state generally has the same goals as the religions with regard to their population: they want more citizens for more money and more power. They also want their citizens conditioned to obey authority unthinkingly and conditioned to create lots of new citizens. Catholics, Protestant evangelicals and Mormons all deliver on these demands, so the state and religions generally are tight with one another on sexual issues.

If you don't believe that the state and the major religions are in line on sexual issues, just look at the current makeup of the Supreme Court: six out of the nine current Supreme Court justices are conservative Catholics in a nation with a population that is only 20 percent Catholic. The justices were hand-picked by conservative legislators to take down Roe v. Wade, and they did it.

I should add that conservative politicians are the ones who work most substantially for religions. The left has been much less cooperative, as many Americans are either not religious at all, or are not deeply religious. They tend to vote more liberal, though they can be censorious over some issues, rarely sexual issues however. I might add that there are many Catholics who are not deeply religious often cross Catholic teachings on sexual issues, particularly contraception.

Fortunately there are forces opposing these forces. Big, powerful forces, too. 

"Look, I'm worried about keeping my family housed and fed. I could give a rat's ass about someone watching this, OK?"

From kink.com video 36433, "Fear Play: Cherie DeVille's Roleplay Fantasy" featuring Cherie Deville and Tommy Pistol.

1) Bigger Issues To Deal With -- As mentioned before people have much bigger problems on their plates than porn. The issues that need to be dealt with are life-endangering in some cases, and life-ruining in others. It's going to be very hard to convince people who are worried about high-priced groceries and rent and mortgages to get all worked up about preventing other people from seeing images of people having sex. It's not exactly central to most people's lives right now.

 There's been no groundswell over Lee's call for censorship. It has only gotten responses from some leaders among the Usual Suspect religions and conservative pols mentioned above. The people have other fish to fry. 

2) Been There, Seen That -- Most of what I've talked about is familiar to most people who've followed these arguments. But here's something new: people are not prone to get roused over the dangers of porn any more because they KNOW porn. Practically all the adults in the US have had the opportunity to watch hardcore porn of whatever they like, for decades. It isn't the dark, hidden, secret sexy thing it once was, and it hasn't been since the 1970s when home video players made it possible to watch porn in complete privacy, huzzah! It's been normalized, as some like to say.

Well the political conservatives and the censorious religions have not been going huzzah! But there was nothing they could do, it was the 70s and only their core groups were interested in censoring adult videos. There were attempts at censorship but they got nowhere. And now that most Americans have had four decades to experience porn, most of them have come to the reasonable conclusion that it's just not a big deal. It's good for keeping the old libido at manageable levels when there's no prospect of managing it with a partner and that's about it. Some people have claimed to be addicted to porn, but it's hard to know to what extent it's a real problem because of course the censorious types are all over that shit. But overall, it seems to be a manageable problem.

My suspicion is that the public's familiarity with porn videos have removed the bogeyman factor from porn. Back before the 70s porn was this big dark hidden thing that could be everything the censorious types said it was. Now the censorious types are decrying the dangers of porn to people who are outside their core who know the "dangers" of porn for the bullshit that it is.

It makes for a very difficult time for censors, which is why I don't think there will be any popular groundswell for censoring porn. But that doesn't mean porn censorship won't happen. The political conservatives and the religious types don't understand that the sexuality control game is over as far as the majority of Americans are concerned. They've still got their core constituencies buffaloed, and they hope to get the rest of us under control, by re-instituting censorship of all pornography, making it dark and mysterious once again, and most of all getting a gripping hand on everyone's libido again.

This will not exactly be a great campaign issue for anyone except a few politicians in deeply conservative areas. That may not matter, because Trump, the Heritage Foundation and others are working very hard to end democracy in the US. If they succeed, voters won't matter. If the President can deport people, even citizens and legal residents, with an executive order, and so far he can, he can probably jail pornographers and and even porn viewers with an executive order.

The courts may have opinions on such orders, but the Trump administration has already demonstrated a willingness to ignore the decisions of the Supreme Court and all the other courts, and if they continue to get away with that courts will no longer have any power at all. If things get worse (and they're certainly headed in the general direction of Worse) there will probably be other Executive Orders that will put Executive Orders about porn in perspective.

I don't think porn is politically exciting enough to get banned for its own sake. I think the most likely avenue for a porn ban would be if the conservatives who run our government want to use it for a distraction to keep people's attention diverted while they do much more dangerous stuff, like end habeus corpus or declare martial law or end elections, much more important goals for them.

Although I don't think  most people would support an executive order banning porn, I do think about 27 percent of the electorate will, if Trump issues one and especially if he starts using his bully pulpit to encourage his people to support banning porn. The Trumpers will support anything Trump says, no matter how ridiculous or even how harmful to them personally it might be. They've proven it time and again. And you can be sure that if the Trumpers get wound up about banning all porn, they will jump on the bandwagon with everything they've got, though that's not nearly as much as it once was.

A porn ban might succeed if used as cover for more dastardly deeds, sliding through as more energy is spent battling more pressing issues. This is very much in keeping with Project 2025 strategy. It's still a very chancy thing, but it could happen.

Now as far as the porn ban and mainstream media getting porn right, obviously if a ban succeeds, that won't happen. Not even porn will get porn right if it's banned! If porn isn't banned, the Usual Suspects will work hard to "other" porn and make it socially unacceptable. This is highly unlikely to work, because the continued availability of porn and its natural attractiveness to people will continue to normalize it, making it even less likely to get banned.

I think the real problem with mainstream media getting sex scenes right will continue to be the first two reasons I listed: the censorship of mainstream media, because explicit images of naked people having sex are unlikely to be shown in media open to people of all ages. It's not a problem, just the nature of the media. And mainstream media will likely tend to continue to interject drama into sex scenes because peaceful, happy sexual relationships aren't all that dramatic.

That's a blowjob, alrighty. Chloe Sevigny in "The Brown Bunny."

Where I see long-term effects will be in movies. As porn normalizes sex scenes, movies will probably allow more and more explicit scenes. It's already happened to a certain extent: Chloe Sevigny gave an explicit blowjob with a cock seen entering her mouth in "The Brown Bunny" and Sharon Stone famously flashed her pussy in "Basic Instinct" and they both continue to get roles in movies, so not much in the way of blowback for them.

Elizabeth Berkley drop-kicks a rapist in Showgirls, with exposed pussy. Now THAT'S a drop-kick!

However, there is one obvious counterexample, and that's Elizabeth Berkley's appearance in "Showgirls." For the story of a Las Vegas nude dancer/stripper/entertainer Elizabeth went fully naked in several scenes, and the film bombed hard. Elizabeth Berkley got a share of the blame, but the director got most of the blame. (Interestingly, "Showgirls" has since developed a cult following. I've watched Showgirls, and it didn't seem teriffically awful to me. My suspicion is that Showgirls pushed the nudity and the sexuality harder than the mainstream critics were ready for, hence the strange vigor of the bad reviews.) Fortunately Berkley's career has gotten back on track since, though not as readily as Sevigny and Stone did.

Sevigny, Stone and Berkley would probably all have been blackballed in Hollywood if their scenes had occurred 40 or 50 years ago. But since the 70s, things have been different. And unless porn gets banned, things will continue to get different. The old Bronze Age grifts of religion and the state have been destroyed by modern contraception and video technology, and the sociopaths who like controlling others will have to use other grifts or lose power. In a few decades maybe we'll develop dramatic conventions that make explicit sex scenes perfectly acceptable in some movies and TV shows. We shall see.

Perhaps one day mainstream reviewers will be able to look at an image like this and see that, in addition to being kinky and sexy, it is beautiful. Look at the way Penny Pax's toes are curling. Look at Carissa Montgomery dommeing it up! The light, the color, the composition of the shot. Beauitiful!

Penny Pax (bottom) and Carissa Montgomery (top) in Kink.com shoot 42344.

Things Like This Often Left Her Teary-Eyed

 
It was fascinating to be able to see what Master was doing to her up close and personal, but so annoying when cum dripped down into her eyes.

Image source: kink.com video 28834, "Hot Hispanic Drilled & Challenged with Unforgiving Bondage" featuring Kristina Rose. 

Leonardo AI: I Did Not Ask For This

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

It's All A Matter of Technique

 
How do you finger a beautiful, helpless redhead? Gingerly, of course! (They're very sensitive.)

Madison Young in kink.com shoot 9448, "Huge Nipples Tied and Stretched, Double Penetrated to Orgasm."

Leonardo AI Motion Videos: A Hit and Two Misses

Leonardo AI still remains problematical in many respects at creating still images but it can still knock them out of the park every so often, as in this image. Lovely image, just about perfect as is, except for a suspicious blob of flesh behind the woman's left hand, and some wonky looking fingers on her left hand. Both very easy to fix, and what a beautiful image otherwise, except for that very straight border between the stream in the back and the foreground green and... oh, hell better stop talking. So I tried a motion video based on this image. And boy, howdy...

What a great video. My prompt was simple, "A beautiful woman lying on a white sofa smiles and waves." Came out great! Some minor morphing 

I tried a motion video based on the Second Life avatar rather than the Leonardo AI interpretation of the avatar, and got some pretty good results, nice facial expressions and hand movements, but, well, you'd best just see for yourself.

The sofa on this one is doing about as much moving around as the woman lying on it, which is unusual behavior unless the woman is lying perfectly still, which this woman definitely is not. And what's with the green geometric grid behind the sofa? It looks like the AI program created a perspective grid for the grass and then said "Ah, fuck it!" and just let the grid stand in for the grass. I know just how that AI felt.

Still, despite the moving sofa and the grass grid, the woman's animation was excellent, much better than usual. The hands look a little sus now and then as they move but not enough to make the animation look bad, and the facial expressions are excellent, as well as the generally honest nudity of the body. But the absolute best part is the way the animation captured the gag and collar. Leonardo AI is very prone to misinterpret gags, because putting the term "gag" in a text prompt makes Leonardo AI refuse to do the animation and give you a warning about, and I kid you not, "sex and violence" in the image.

So mostly I don't mention collars and gags and cuffs and shackles and hope for the best: "A beautiful woman waves and smiles." And mostly what I get is wierd-looking gag-like things and instead of collars I get necklaces. Cuffs morph into bracelets, generally silly-looking ones. Ankle shackles become ankle bracelets and ringlets and sometimes shoes. (Which, granted, is often an improvement over whatever the hell Leonardo AI does to feet.)

But the collar and gag on this cutie are dead-on, pretty much the same as the ones on the SL Avatar except they're in motion. I'm sure there's a lesson in there somewhere for all of us, but I'm not at all sure what it is.

Let's close with an example of a Leonardo AI animation handling a gag badly:

Ladies and gentlemen, may we present the Duck-Billed Slavegirl! Woo-hoo!

But overall, for nekkid cutie animations, Leonardo AI Motion is still kicking Kling AI's ass big time. Because except for that duck bill excuse for a panel gag, that's one hell of a finc animation of a naked woman writhing enticingly on a sofa.

She Lied So Blatantly She Should Have Been A Politician

"You're the one, Rocko, the only one, my heart beats only for you! Oh, that guy fucking me up the ass right now? He means NOTHING to me, Rocko, nothing!"

This is from kink.com shoot 104259, "Princess Donna Destroyed," featuring Donna Dolore (center) James Deen (right) and Mr. Pete (leftish).

Wishing A Wonderful Mother's Day To All The Kinky Moms!

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

When Slavegirls Collide!

"Sir, it'a an emergency! We've got slavegirls stacked up and circling Dungeon 348B, waiting for a cock to land on. We need more slave traffic controllers stat!"

Lorelei Lee (foreground) and Cherry Torn (background) in Kink.com shoot 105222, "Claire & Orlando vs. Lorelei and Cherry."

Such A Deal!

"I can't BELIEVE the deal I got on this place. Just $1500 a month AND I can pee on my downstairs neighbor!"

Real Page is certainly making some changes in the real estate market. From kink.com shoot 34922 "The Kennels." Porn stars are, from top left to lower right: Daisy Ducati, Bella Rossi and Juliette March.

Sure Puts Trivia Night In Perspective

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Kinkier Education

The decision at Saints Preserve Us School to combine Passion Play instruction with sex education classes was very popular with the students but for the instructors, it was just another Tuesday.

From Kink.com shoot 15027, "The Debasement of Lori Lansing."

Leonardo AI Hates Foot Fetishists

It started with this. An innocent-looking Second Life avatar chained to a sofa in a beautiful park. No greenscreen here, it's all Second Life. Rentable set, sofa purchased on the Second Life marketplace, with custom avatar. Still, the mix of cartoonish avatar and sofa and realistic background (clearly just a photo on a prim) just didn't work. So I ran it through Leonardo to get that lifelike feel.

Now THAT'S more like it! I made many more runs through Leonardo AI than usual this time. The people who use prompts entirely do this, so I thought I'd try it. And it worked, although I spent hours on just that one step this time, so there was a cost. But just LOOK at that women. OK, maybe she appears to be bending the knee a little too much, but I figure readers might think it's a cushion beneath the cover. But as always with AI art, there's a catch.

Oh, Leonardo, you just don't have feet down yet, do you? The Lovecraftian foot strikes again! Though perhaps this is Leonardo AI's attempt to show how ingrown toenails feel, visually.