Prison Bitch 3 Cover Censored By Direct2Digital

 I got a note this morning from Direct2Digital stating that my cover art was too pornographic. As is usual with censorship, it was very vague about what was offensive on my cover. For reference, this is the cover they censored:

As you'll note, all naughty bits are covered by red smoke. The complaint said no nudity is allowed on the covers, and listed various body parts that are not allowed: nipples, butts, butt cracks, glory trails and nudity. It's kept vague to make artists censor their work more heavily. If you aren't quite sure what's allowed by the guidelines, you tend to censor yourself more heavily, making censors happier. Censors are a diseased and twisted part of the human race that can only get off sexually by not allowing others to see sexy images or read sexy things.

Of course there is an obvious butt crack on the cover, belonging to the woman lying on the floor. I thought it would be OK since the woman is clearly wearing a thong. The waist bands are very clear and obvious. And the darkness at the top of her butt crack looks exactly like what the top of a thong generally looks like when seen from the rear. But clearly, this is not how the censor "saw" it. So I made some changes on my cover to cover all possible contingencies, and that's how we wind up with the new cover as seen below:

The new "improved" cover for Prison Bitch 3. All naughty bits covered with smoke. The woman hanging from the ceiling is just a bunch of body parts, and the image of the woman in the foreground isn't much better. It is, in my opinions, worse in every respect than the cover I went with. I mean, I could write some bullshit about the cover being more dramatic because it puts more focus on the women's faces, but that would be bullshit. It's a worse cover than the original one. And it's also much worse than the cover I imagined when I made up the cover. This one:

Oh, look, boobies! Not all THAT different from my initial cover, but I think all the naked women and the red smoke and the guys with guns work together when the women are actually, visibly naked. Plus, this is erotica, dammit! Those two brown nipple dots aren't going to destroy anyone who's sane. And setting your standards for insane people is insane!

And the hell of it is, I have a lot of VERY NAKED covers. For example:

And this:

These covers are current covers that are just fine by Direct2Digital. I have no idea why. In any event, my apologies for the cover art. It was not my idea.

Slavegirl Lingo 101

 
This is what slavegirls mean when they talk about "Getting the hookup."

From "The Neighbors: Housewife Bound & Fucked in the Ass by Kinky Neighbors!" starring (from left to right): Isis Love, Chanel Preston and Ramon Nomar, kink.com shoot #101158.

A TRUE Porn Star

 
A TRUE porn star is a woman who can be stripped naked, tied hand and foot, get fucked orally and anally by two different Masters at the same time, and STILL manage to give the cameraman the eye! Certainly puts true Scotsmen in perspective!

Jada Stevens, Mr. Pete and Mark Davis in "Married to the Mob" kink.com shoot 14647. 

A Great Promo Video from Kling AI And A Couple of Very Bad Videos

I started this Kling video by removing the text from my book cover art, getting this image.

The original artwork. Surely the basis for an interesting video!

Watch it and weep... for joy! On my third attempt I got this very usable video. The prompt for this one was: "A room filled with smoke, lit by red light, with women screaming as men enter the room firing weapons. One woman dangles from the ceiling kicking her legs wildly, one woman lies still on the floor, another woman is bent over, frozen in fear."

The first time I ran the art through Kling AI I went with a simple, straightforward prompt: "A room filled with smoke, lit by red light, with women screaming and struggling to escape as men enter the room firing weapons at other men." and I got this:

This is actually a pretty good video. Except for the woman in the foreground who kinda... deflates. I did not ask for that! But I do like the way the blonde's expression changes, and the way that bit of drool dangling from her chin sways as she sways. Interesting stuff! But unusable because of Deflating Woman. 

This one KINDA works, but although the woman in the foreground doesn't deflate as severely as in the last video, she does deflate some. And why does the soldier stick his rifle barrel in the butt of the woman lying on the floor? I did not ask for that! Let her pine for the fjords in peace! Prompt for this one was: "A room filled with smoke, lit by red light, with women screaming and struggling to escape as men enter the room firing weapons. One woman dangles from the ceiling kicking her legs wildly, one woman lies still on the floor, another woman is bent over, collapsing as she is shot."

Finally I came up with the prompt you see in the first video, which did "work" for me and I hope it works for you. That concludes our lesson in Bad AI Videos for today!

Cover Story: "Prison Bitch 3" The Hell Of Leonardo AI And Other Tribulations

Once again too impoverished to hire a cover artist, I sallied forth with my limited skills and helplessly left-brained brain to create a masterpiece and came forth with, well, probably not a masterpiece.

I’ve always liked the weird aesthetic of the old Men’s Adventure magazines, or “sweat mags” as they were also called. They weren’t really bondage porn but they were VERY prone to stories about Nazis, World War II-era Japanese soldiers and other seriously evil types tormenting scantily clad women whose only crime was beauty.

I think that aesthetic would go very well with softcore bondage porn or even hardcore bondage porn. The raw, lurid qualities of the covers translate well into porn. And I had a scene in my story that fit right in with the sweat mag aesthetic, so I was all over it.

What I wanted was a scene of prison guards and raiders shooting it out in a red-lit room filled with smoke and naked or scantily clad screaming women in bondage. For the record, here’s what I came up with:

But getting there was a real pain in the ass. The easy part, it turned out, was getting the naked, scantily clad screaming women. Usually that’s an issue with most commercial art AIs. And Leonardo AI as usual did morphy tricks with hands, feet, breasts and whatnot, but for some reason it wasn’t all that prudish about nudity. Au contraire, as I explained in my post about the Jinkie Jenkins promo cover.

To get the various naked women in bondage I used several mostly naked Second Life avatars and ran them through various bondage poses. I got quite a few images, some of them pretty good, some of them unusable and most of them kind of in the middle. I picked out three and ran them through Leonardo AI to see if I could get them humanized. And mostly it worked.

It worked most spectacularly on the SL avatar that had the best expression. This one:

I have an attachment for my Second Life avatars that allows me to place various expressions on their faces. The horrified and shocked look on the avatar’s face worked beautifully. But the distortion on the mouth was too much for the SL avatar to handle. Although the expression was approximately correct, the mouth was misshapen, ruining the whole effect.

Fortunately, when I ran the avatar through Leonardo AI it corrected the mouth perfectly. It also added to the shock and horror of the expression and made the flesh more smooth and lifelike.

I also wanted a body lying on the floor. That proved very easy, the SL avatar in a sleeping pose worked fine. The hands were especially nice, and I was afraid that when I ran it through Leonardo AI it would do its usual hi-jinks with the hands. But it did not, they came out beautifully, and the flesh came out fleshier, too.

Those hand are just exquisite. I suspect because the fingers are fully extended and roughly in parallel. Very unlike AI art to get them so right. Butt came out nice, too, not like the pussybutts.

So we had our picture of a dead woman. Except, in case there’s some rule against dead women on the covers of erotica, I want it clearly understood that the woman is not dead, she is merely pining for the fjords, as sex slaves sometimes do.

Finally, there was our woman hanging from the ceiling, who is of course Kim Halstead, the protagonist of the story. Her SL avatar was problematical. Her feet were a mess and her torso was kind of twisty.

So I ran it through Leonardo AI hoping for improvement and I got some. The torso came out fine, the face and hair were more lifelike, but the feet were still a mess and in fact her calves had some weird new bulges to them. Also her facial expression was wrong. She was supposed to be terrified. But the ballgag prevented her mouth from conveying her terror, and her eyes were staring calmly at the viewer and her brows were relaxed, giving her more of a "What’s-all-this-then?" expression. Which works in some cases of women wearing ballgags but not this one. So I had to go in there and use my vaunted artistic skills to make her look horrified.

The torso on this Leonardo AI output doesn't look twisty, but the feet are still a mess and there are all sorts of strange lumps on her calves that weren't there before. Plus, her expression is what art directors call "All Wrong."

Leonardo doesn't "get" ballgags at all. So I got a few like this. But at least the horrible ballgag and mouth distract from what's going on with the hands.

This is the best result I got from Leonardo AI. The fingers are dodgy and the she doesn't look terrified or horrified, just... concerned.

New and improved! I didn't spot the issue with the expression until I already had the background art and a lot of the smoke laid in, plus I'd altered the darkness of the image to fit in more with the "smoke-filled room" atmosphere. That's why the image is so much darker than the others. I erased portions of the old eyebrows, drew in new ones, widened the eyes and put in a little drool from the ballgag for good measure. (Also it subtly makes her look more helpless and out of control.) And I lopped off an extra finger or three that were on the original.

With my naked women quota fulfilled, I needed the background art, the room in which the gunfight was being held, filled with smoke and lit by red lights.

Generally, Leonardo AI and other art AIs don’t do well with crowds and people shooting guns. I would much rather have gone to Deposit Photos and used it for background art. But Deposit Photos (and most other image services) generally are weak on images of gunfights inside a room or a building. There are lots of images of soldiers fighting in the outdoors, but very few interior shots.

So it was back to Leonardo AI. And it is better than Deposit Photos about giving you soldiers fighting in a room. The problem was that the soldiers often pointed their guns at their allies, rather than the enemy. And they sometimes did not hold the guns properly. The guns also tended to morph and generally look sus. I had wanted an image of two groups of men firing guns at one another with screaming naked women caught in the crossfire.

But what I wound up settling for was one group of men carrying guns and running toward the viewer. Only one of them was pointing his gun at an ally! Then I placed the naked women screaming in the foreground.

And the thing I had to tie it all together with was smoke. Yeah, that red smoke covers up a lot of sins, and I’m not just talking about Kim’s nipples and genitals. I’m also talking about those ugly feet and calves. And the screaming woman’s breasts. And her hands. Smoke is my new favorite cover art element!

OK, not EXACTLY what I wanted, but there ARE soldiers in a room.

OK, SOMEBODY'S about to get shot. Just not any identifiable enemies. This happened a LOT.

After all this work I wound up with a cover that was a lot closer to my original intent than I expected. Was it as good as I would have gotten if I’d hired a decent cover artist? Of course not. But I do like it. It does have that sweat mag cover feel to it. Will readers like it, too? I guess we’ll find out…

When Protagonists Collide in "Prison Bitch 3: Red Hell In Club Rape!"

Lexi Belle looking lovely as she enjoys the feel of the vibrator wand tucked between her legs with the wand head placed where it will do the most pleasure. It's one of several images I used to help establish the mood for some scenes. At least, that's what I tell my wife, but I don't think she buys it...

Lexi Belle from kink.com shoot 5660.

Mack Beacher is a takeoff on Jack Reacher, the hero of a series of books by Lee Child and Andrew Child. Beacher is introduced at the very end of “Club Rape” the second book in my Prison Bitch trilogy. He’s very much an action hero, a traveling investigator who breaks up crime rings and such as he finds him in his travels around America.

The relative of another victim of Club Rape tell Beacher about the goings-on at Brookhaven Prison while Beacher is visiting Lubbock, Texas, and that’s enough to get Beacher to Brookhaven. He gets a job as a guard there and quickly discovers that all the rumors about Club Rape are true and he sets up plans to raid Club Rape in a way that Casto can’t adapt to.

That’s all early in the story, no real spoilers. Point is, Beacher is coming at Club Rape like the protagonist of an action hero story, but he’s not really the protagonist of the Prison Bitch series, Kim and her friends are. To him Kim and the other victims are almost non-player characters in their story, but they don’t see themselves that way. This conflict becomes important later in the story, which is really about what having a good life means. It’s the literary aspect of the story, pitting what “winning” means to an action hero versus what it means to the heroine of an erotic thriller.

I like to think this adds depth to my story, but whether it does or not is of course, the reader’s judgment to make. Along those lines, I made sure Beacher wasn’t a cartoonishly shallow character. He’s got a code and he lives by it, and if he has to accept responsibility for unfortunate events, he does so. He’s not normal, he’s an action hero, but he’s not shallow.

With all this action heroing and so forth going on, you might think it was difficult for me to find ways to have lots of kinky bondage sex scenes in my story, but no, it was quite easy, actually, and the scenes helped build the characters and themes as well. It’s a win win win! Hopefully this will make for a compelling sexy read. Only one way to discover the truth… get the book here!

"Prison Bitch 3: Red Hell In Club Rape!" Now On Sale On Smashwords!

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Great Antique Shop Find!

 
When Abella saw the device at the antique shop she thought she'd found some incredible old farmhouse implement. Her Master didn't know what it was used for originally, but he had his own ideas about it.

Abella Danger in kink.com shoot 41449, "HR Nightmare."

So Romantic

 

When Master chains you to his bed even when he's already got you tied up and gagged... that's when you KNOW he's thinking... "she's a keeper!"

From "The Loan Shark's Daughter," Kink.com shoot 38398, starring Alina West and Seth Gamble

Woopsies!

 

Finally here she was, tied down good, totally helpless, ready to be fu... oh, right, there was supposed to be something else. There was supposed to be a guy here to fuck her! And untie her! She KNEW she'd forgotten something!

Image source: kink.com shoot 30710, "Rougher, Harder, Crazier!" featuring Kenzie Vaughn and James Deen.

New "Jenkie Jenkins, Snoopy Reporter: Captured By Gangsters" Promo Art Via Leonardo AI

Had to share this. This is what happens when Lenardo gets things right. This is from the same avatar I used for the cover art. Leonardo removed the nipple shields and the ballgag and created breasts with nipples and everything. Wow. (See SL Avatar below.) And if you want to buy the book, a very popular one of mine, here's the link.

Amazing! This is the SL avatar art I sent to Leonardo AI which then created the female figure above. I did not ask fot the nipple shields to be removed, not the ballgag, nor the thong, nor the leg shackles. My exact prompt was: "A redheaded woman kneels on the floor." The background art was from a prompt, and was harder to get than the avatar image. It kept wanting to have a central focus on one or two people, even though I asked for background art with no central focus. I don't think Leonardo understands "background art" at all.

Leonardo AI Introduces: The Pussybutt!

 

This is where it all started. I uploaded this image of a Second Life avatar to Leonardo AI just to see how Leonardo would deal with it. I used Image to Image in Legacy mode to create a lifelike, kinda/sorta image of my avatar. I already had a pretty good idea that Leonardo AI would deal with the image badly. But how badly, and in what way? It took only seconds to find out!

What I got was... the pussybutt! In almost every case, Leonardo AI decided that at the juncture of the upper butt cheeks there should be a pussy. But it's more, much more, well maybe not a WHOLE lot more, but definitely more. If you close in on the upper portion of the avatar, it becomes evident that what has happened is that the Leonardo AI apparently decided that the image wasn't looking down at a woman bending over in front of the viewer. Instead, it decided that the viewer was sitting behind the avatar, looking up at her naked butt cheeks and lower back and upper thighs which had been flipped upside down and remounted to her torso in a surgery too awful to even have a name.

I am an experienced AI creator. I had expected hands to become feet and feet to become hands. But I never expected the pussybutt. I also never expected a breast to morph into an arm with a foothand at its end. Makes the hand that morphed into a foot look prosaic.

We'll close with the one image where a pussy butt didn't appear. This one. Apparently on this occasion Leonardo AI recognized the string thong the avatar is wearing for what it is, and did the inappropriate thing. Of course. Now the string thong slides between the avatar's butt cheeks and disappears into a seriously misplaced anus. If you look close you can see that Leonardo AI even dirtied up the bit of string that's halfway into the seriously misplaced anus. That's commitment! And you also have to wonder, if the thong string is in the anus, what would be holding the bottom of the pussy cover in place? It could be flapping around all over the place. Unless... unless the string at the front is shoved into the woman's vagina. Though that would make hiding the vagina more difficult, if not impossible. Maybe... maybe the front strong could be tied to a dildo thrust deep into the vagina, a dildo with a large triangular shield on its end that stays out of the vagina and shields it. Is this... is this how fashion designers think? Am I becoming a defacto fashion designer here? Scary! Anyway, the string could disappear into another, normally placed anus. She would just have two anuses. Nothing wrong with that! It's almost enough to make up for the hand that became a foot and the foot that's becoming a hand and the breast that has morphed into a flesh connector of some kind between the avatar's rib cage and her knee. Of course. I think I'll stop now before I become a Lovecraftian fasion designer, and before Leonardo AI creates something even more Lovecraftian for me to wonder about.

Cowboys Have It Easy

Cowboys have it easy. They can lift themselves by their bootstraps. Slavegirls, however, are required to lift themselves by their butthooks.

Image is from "The Training of Claire Robbins, Day 3" starring Claire Robbins, kink.com shoot 28939.

What's Going On In Penny Pax's Labiatory?

The idea was to give her an orgasm so powerful that it blew all the clothespins off at once.

Penny Pax in "Kidnap, Inc.," kink.com shoot 42476.

Here's lookin' at you!

She was a charming and incredibly flexible woman but he never could get used to the way she could twist her neck like that.

Image source is Roxanne Rae (face) Lauren Phillips (butt) and Derek Pierce (cock) from kink.com shoot 40171.

Rich Bitch, Prison Bitch Trilogy Picked Up By Hillmark Productions As Part of Sassy Prison Rape TV Series Aimed At Young Adult Viewers

 
by: Pat Powers

Special to: Hollywood Inside Scoop

April 1, 2025

“Why not rape?” asked Hillmark Senior Vice President in Charge of Acquisitions Cherry Sassoon as I sat with her and discussed the new Hillmark series based on my semi-incredible “Prison Bitch Trilogy.” “That was the question that always hovered over the table when we had discussions about what new properties to pick up. We knew we were doing a fine job of covering the market for insipid, almost humorless romcoms. And we’ve got the romantic cozy mystery market sewed up, too.

“But we also knew that there was a huge market out there for rape erotica, bondage erotica, incest erotica and bestiality erotica that we were underserving, in the sense of not serving them at all, in any way,” Sassoon continued.

“Isn’t serving those markets mostly illegal?” I asked.

“Not in the purely legal sense,” said Sassoon. “The only porn that’s straight up illegal is the underage stuff. Hillmark will never touch that market, because our own viewers would tear us limb from limb if we tried.”

“That does sound awful,” I observed painfully.

“Oh, it was… I mean, it would be,” said Sassoon. “Anyway, we decided that the most popular way to go was rape. There were all sorts of good reasons for this. About 70 million of them, in fact.”

“Seventy million?” I asked. “Where did you get that number?”

“That’s the number of copies of “Fifty Shades of Gray” sold worldwide in its first YEAR of release,” said Sassoon.

“But Fifty Shades of Gray isn’t about rape, it’s about a consensual BDSM relationship,” I said.

“Oh, that’s just tedious rapey-wapey timey wimey stuff,” said Sassoon. “Rape, BDSM, bondage, romance, they’re all pretty much the same. You say potayto, I say puhtato. The old timey romance writers knew the truth of it.”

“All right, I’ll bite,” I said. “How is romance the same as rape? It would seem to be the complete opposite.”

“No, rape is the ultimate in romance,” said Sassoon. “The old time romance writers had a subgenre called “bodice rippers” which were basically historical rape romance stories. The male MC, typically a pirate or a sheik, kidnaps a proper English or American woman and is so overwhelmed by her beauty and grace and charm or whatever that he rapes her. Then they make up and fall in love and he apologizes to her and rapes her some more and then proposes marriage and they both live rapily ever after.”

“But I wrote the “Prison Bitch” trilogy, god help me, and there are no romantic rapes at all in it,” I said. “All the rapists were psychopaths and sociopaths of various stripes.”

“Oh yeah? What about that Paul guy at the end?” Sassoon asked. “He is supposed to be very romantic.”

“He’s not a rapist, he’s a consensual lover, very big on safewords and so forth,” I said. “Did you even read the books?”

“Of course not, that’s why you hire English majors, women with no lives, to read stuff so I don’t have to. They condensed the trilogy into this one sheet of paper here,” Sassoon said, holding up a battered, stained piece of paper with a few paragraphs typed on it. “This kind of time-saving is why I’m an executive. Plus having the wit to see the romance behind all the rape.”

“So, the rape story is going to become a romance, I see,” I said. “Any other intriguing changes to the story in the books?”

“Oh, yes indeed,” said Sassoon. “We’re thinking we need to pull back on the whole rich bitch storyline. What with all the Luigi stuff that’s happened in real life, it’s kind of obvious that our readership may not be in the market for stories about wealthy people unless it’s a fall from grace type story. So we’re thinking of having Kim be a welder or a beautician or something.”

“But “Rich Bitch, Prison Bitch” IS a fall from grace story,” I said. “It’s right there in the title. Kim starts out a rich bitch and winds up a prison bitch in every sense of the word. She goes from shady banker and party girl to everyone’s favorite rape victim. You can’t have a bigger fall from grace!”

“Sure, there’s a fall from grace of sorts in there, I suppose,” said Sassoon. “But it’s not enough of a fall to make up for her early wealth in these days. So that is not happening. She’s a welder, or a sassy waitress like AOC, something like that. And she get picked up for shoplifting milk for someone else’s baby, and goes to jail and gets raped because, of course, she’s a beautiful welder. Well, ex-welder.”

“And how is the rape going to be handled?” I asked, dreading the answer.

“Two ways,” said Sassoon. “We have two markets here, older readers who want to recapture the gauzy pleasures of old-time bodice ripper romances, and more modern readers who are down to watch fucking. For the older readers we’ll have a version where, as soon as they get past the chaste kissing stage, which basically is as soon as the sex starts, we’ll cut away to a visual metaphor. Like maybe a pillow tightly wrapped in rope being poked repeatedly with an eggplant with sexy moaning and grunting in the background. Something along those lines.”

“Sounds boffo to me,” I said agreeably. “What about younger viewers?”

Oh, we’ll give them a long, steamy erotic buildup lots of near-nudity and some full nudity, but no genitals, you know, and no genitals in action,” said Sassoon. “I mean, they will do some fucking, but only R-rated stuff, you won’t see tab A going into Slot B nor any of the other slots. And what you do see won't last too long.”

“How do you plan to tie her up?” I asked.

“Well, about that…” said Sassoon. “We where thinking maybe a blindfold would do the trick for delivering the kinky.”

“Mrs. Sassoon, the people who read my book read it BECAUSE of all the bondage and rape, not despite it,” I said. “They wanted those extreme sexual bondage scenes, they enjoy them. If you back off from the sexual bondage they are not going to stick around for the story, riveting though it is. You’re not going to get those seventy million viewers you wanted.”

“Well maybe not seventy million,” Sassoon agreed. “But we’ll get quite a few. While I’m sure your readers enjoyed your books, my summary of Fifty Shades of Gray indicates it was pretty damn tame.”

“Oh, it was, I read it,” I said. “Eight chapters until they got around to kissing, very tame indeed. But when they did get down to it, they got down to it big time. She was cuffed, blindfolded, tied up and being fucked in the movie. And the movie had very, very good box office.”

“Ah,” said Sassoon. I could see the dollar signs flashing in her otherwise empty eyes. “That’s a very good point. Can’t let censors destroy artistic qualities, now can we?”

“You’d be surprised how much the sort of people who read my books care about artistic qualities,” I observed.

“The summary does say your books are full of artistic qualities,” said Sassoon, nodding sagely.

“My readers wouldn’t have it any other way,” I said.

Note: the day after the interview with Cherry I received a call from Hillmark’s HIP (Hot Intellectual Properties) department head. She explained to me that Hillmark had chosen the script based on my story to be converted into the first story in a brand new series about a coven of detective witches who try to change the bad reputation of witches by solving crimes and doing good deeds using their special powers. Also, a giant spider will be a regular character in the show. They’ll start by rescuing the inmates of Brookhaven Prison from Club Rape. This will necessitate further changes in the script, but I am assured that the spirit of the story will be fully served, whatever that means.

I’m so glad I got my check in advance!

Making Their Opinions Known

Two peasant women perform the Ritual Dance of Objectification to express their opposition to the slavegirl being naked in the streets in Lovonia.

Photo is from a video that is spread far and wide all over the web. Can't find a definitive origin. The video is generally identified as Nella in Budapest. Model is known as Nella, Nelly and Jana Miartusova. Use keywords Nella Budapest to find copies of the video online.

New Promo Art for Prison Bitch 2

 Came up with a nice promo based on the cover, thought I'd share. Prison Bitch 3 will be live in a week or three, meantime, might want to brush up on all the rape, rape, rape, rape (and all of it sexual bondage rape) in Prison Bitch 2. Here's the link if you don't already have Prison Bitch 2.

Topping From Below...

 

"Just a LEETLE bit faster on the vibrator please, Master!"

Jodi Taylor topping from below in kink.com shoot 32905.

After A While, They'll Submit to Anyone... Or Anything

 

Bonnie had so many tattoos that Riley felt she had no choice -- she HAD to submit to her tattoos!

Bonnie Rotten and Riley Reid in New Sensations shoot "She's in charge."

Be Careful What You Wish For When It Comes To Sexual Bondage

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Slavegirls Just Can't Help Pissing Off Their Owners Sometimes

Slavegirls are not permitted dignity if their owner so desires.

This slavegirl mocked her owner's O-face. Now it's her turn...

Belle Noire in kink.com shoot 29526.

The Game of Plugs

How the game is played: Several slavegirls who have never played this game before are butt plugged and hooded and led into a quiet room with a one-way mirror glass along one wall. They are ordered to prostrate themselves. (The one whose legs are close together had her legs kicked apart shortly after this photo was taken.) On the other side of the mirror glass gamblers look at the slaves and make wagers on their favorite. The room is allowed to become absolutely quiet. The slavegirls should be nervous, told nothing about the game they are participating in, but ominous hints about unnamed punishments can be dropped. When it's dead silent, the person who led them in pulls out a pistol loaded with blanks and fires it into the air. Slavegirl whose buttplug travels the farthest is declared the winner. 

Scene is from kink.com shoot 12959, Service Day: Candy. Slavegirl butts belong to Candy Manson, Iona Grace, Lilla Katt and Sparky Sin Claire. I may have slightly misdescribed the scene here, in the sense that I made it up completely.

Satan's Other Orifice!

 

Only one thing could save her from the demon that had overtaken her: the Church's most controversial ritual: the anal exorcism!

Phoenix Marie and Ramon Nomar (the pornstar who puts the "pal" in "palindrome) in "Rogue Anal Agent: Flipping Ice" Kink.com shoot 42417.

Eye of the Beholder

 

Top: Penny Pax trying to look innocent in one of the lebenty million shoots she's done for Kink.com. Bottom: Angel Allwood looking ready for action in kink.com shoot 34676, "Confessions of a Submissive."

Subspace Launcher!

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

Pornovision and Mainstream Media

We live in a bifurcated media world. There is mainstream media, and there is porn, and there isn’t much in between. You know what sex in mainstream media is, here’s a pic if you need a reminder:

Michelle Willians enjoying some doggie-style sex in "Blue Valentine."
No genitals were seen in this scene! But it's shocking, you betcha! Somehow.

You know what porn looks like, here's a pic from an online porn vid:

Notice all the genitals are clearly visible plus Lexi's anus. You can clearly see what's going on here. Very different! This is Lexi Lowe in kink.com shoot 39931. This is porn!

So OK, you say, let us grant that we live in a media world where readily available and pretty much uncensored online porn has very different standards than relatively heavily censored mainstream media, which often can't show female breasts or butts or male butts, and of course no genitals, ever. (Well, almost ever.) As a result of this bifurcation, people who write for mainstream media, and for mainstream online sites, generally pretend that porn does not exist, or that they're only watched by a small subset of freaky men. 

This is of course bullshit, almost all men watch porn of one sort or another. Google AI says 69 percent of men watch porn and forty percent of women watch porn. I personally think Google AI has been lied to a lot, and we need to add 30 percent to both of those numbers to get at the truth. Lot of lying goes on when it comes to sex and porn.

When men and women who watch porn (which is MOST adults) watch mainstream movies and TV shows they don't forget that porn exists. The memories of the porn they've seen remains. And that affects the way they perceived the mainstream stuff. And believe me, they aren't buying the bullshit the mainstream put out while they're pretending porn doesn't exist. 

And this has had a number of implications that mainstream media writers miss, either intentionally or simply because porn is by definition outside their Overton window. Problem is, porn is inside the Overton window of almost everyone who watches mainstream media, because almost everyone watches porn. When viewers think "racy" or "sexy" or "shocking" or "wild" they're thinking of images from porn as well as mainstream media. And when they compare those porn images in their minds with the images that mainstream media call "shocking" and "wild" they know they are being bullshitted, and that the writer is a bullshitter and hence, not credible.

They don't even have to do it consciously, in fact, I strongly suspect the vast majority of viewers don't make conscious comparisons, but still, they make those comparisons. More on that later. In the meantime, just look at the nice pictures.

OMG! Dina Myer shamelessly flaunts her body in a pose just like a dummy

 in a Victoria's Secret underwear store in "Star Trek: The Undiscovered Country!
Gratuitous nudity, you betcha!

Rachel Roxxx shamelessly flaunts her beauty in kink.com shoot 5027. Such porn!

And that is how mainstream media lose credibility, by repeatedly demonstrating that they don't understand that while the WRITERS have neatly parcelled off mainstream media from porn with their words, viewers have done no such thing in their minds. I'm not saying that viewers don't understand the difference between porn and mainstream media. They do. I'm saying that when they hear a media image or video described "shocking" "wild" or "sexy" that the images that come up in viewers' minds includes things they've seen in porn. Their mind isn't parsing things with the care the mainstream writers are paid to. So when viewers hear "wild" "sexy" or "shocking" they see those porn images and the mainstream images that come up in the article are just lame compared to the porn images.

But the issues don't stop there. The readily availability of online porn vids also has other effects on viewer perceptions of mainstream media. It greatly diminishes the viewers' interest in seeing mainstream "sex scenes" or "nude scenes" because if a viewer wants to see a sex scene or a nude scene, they can just watch a stardard online porn video and get much nakeder, sexier images. Especially now that porn is full of absolutely beautiful women who are in many cases just as beautiful as Hollywood stars.

Upper left: mainstream actress Sydney Sweeney in "The Voyeurs," upper right: vidcap of porn actress Christina Carter in kink.com shoot 3441, lower left, mainstream actress Nicole Kidman holding curtains, lower right, porn actress Haley Spades taking selfie. I am not making direct comparisons here: I am not saying that Christina Carter is as beautiful as Sydney Sweeney or that Haley Spades is as beautiful as Nicole Kidman. I am saying that all four actresses are striking beauties. If there is a beauty gap between porn actresses and mainstream actresses, it isn't a huge one. There are a LOT of gorgeous women making porn.

So sexy is no longer the selling point for mainstream movies and TV shows that it once was. It's not even close. When viewers see a mainstream sex scene like the one in "Blue Velvet" they are absolutely unimpressed because they have seen WAAAY sexier and WAAY better sex scenes in porn, often featuring very attractive porn stars.  

Left: Mainstream movie actress Milla Jovovich as Leeloo in "The Fifth Element" a costume frequently described as "shocking" and "gratuitous" by professional pearl clutchers. Right: porn star Pepper Hart putting "gratuitous" in perspective.

Viewing mainstream sexy content with alarm falls flat for the same reasons that calling it sexy falls flat, but damn, they still do it. One of the biggest offenders in this regard are the Youtube channels WatchMojo and MsMojo but there are plenty of others. Sex scenes that go "too far" "grautuitous" nudity, etc. Invariably the tame mainstream scenes are Not All That compared to actual porn. And viewers know that, undermining the intended effect.

It's an even more pronounced phenomenon when, as most often happens, the media attempt to have their cakes and eat them too, by viewing mainstream nude/sex scenes with alarm while at the same time using the appeal of nude/sex scenes to attract viewers. This is clearly the mechanism in a lot of WatchMojo and MsMojo nude/sex compendiums. Porn imagery just puts the "shocking" nature of such scenes in perspective and makes viewers realize how very thin the rationale for such compenediums are.

Top: Haile Berry shockingly exposes her breasts in a gratuitous topless scene for a mere $500,000 in the movie "Swordfish." Bottom: Chanel Preston's left nipple is shockingly exposed as she is anally reamed by a guy, forcing her lips up against another womans labial lips with every thrust in kink.com shoot 38578, aka "The Hunt."

The awareness of porn imagery also makes all the conventions mainstream sex scenes have to prevent nudity more obvious and unbelievable. Like the scene when a woman sits around after sex with a sheet covering her breasts. Women don't do that for real unless the room is cold or they're insecure about their body. But gorgeous actresses do it in mainstream sex scenes all the time, because they have to hide their breasts for censorship reasons. Nobody buys it, people know how they behave after sex, and what the porn people do after sex is a lot closer to what real people do than what mainstream media people do, i.e., they lie around naked. They've just been naked and fucking each other, what do they have to hide from one another?

This also extends to mainstream documentaries about sex in the movies. Generally such documentaries deal only with mainstream movies and TV shows, either leaving out porn entirely or mentioning some porn films without pointing out how very different they are from mainstream sexual imagery. And so the old familiar happens: everybody who has watched porn, which is practically everybody, knows the documentary is bullshit because it only covers mainstream sexual imagery which is incredibly lame compared with porn.

Now comes the part I was talking about talking about later earlier in this post, the part about people not making CONSCIOUS comparisons between mainstream and porn imagery. This is where we get into BRAIN SALAD SURGERY. Er, brain surgery. Ok, so the brain is divided into two halves, the left half and the right half. Bilateral symmetry to the max. They're connected by a thick bundle of nerves running between them called the corpus callosum. It's what allows us to have the illusion that we have a single brain instead of two half wits, which is definitely what all of us are.

Top: Dakota Johnson's nipple is shockingly almost visible in this deeply underlit but still very shocking kinky (she's blindfolded!) scene from "Fifty Shades of Gray." Bottom: Dee Williams really leans into her ballgag head harness as she's suspended from the ceiling by ropes while being vaginally penetrated by Ariel X wearing a strap-on in kink.com shoot 27515. The folds of Dee's labia make an interesting pattern around the strap-on in a very artistic sort of way I think we can all agree. 

The two halves of the brain handle separate tasks. For example, the right hemisphere handles visual stuff, creativity, nonverbal communication, spatial processing, basically all the cool stuff. The left brain handles math, verbal communication, analytical thinking, logic, science, reading and writing, basically all the square stuff. The two halves swap information via the corpus callosum, and everything is hunky-dory as scientists say, allowing us to think we're one person instead of two halfwits.

I know this sounds like pseudoscience, but it's all borne out by experimental evidence. People who have particularly violent siezures that are life-threatening are sometimes treated via surgery that severs the corpus callosum, confining the seizures to just half of the brain, making them less severe and hence less life-threatening. Such people have been tested by psychologists and the results of that testing show that these various functions are confined to the different halves of the brain. For example, if you cover up the left eye of a person whose corpus callosum has been severed and show them a picture of a chicken, they can see it but they can't describe it verbally or name it but they can draw a copy of it, because the left eye is controlled by the right hemisphere which handles spatial analysis and nonverbal communication, which includes drawing. If you cover up the right eye of such a person, which is controlled by the left hemisphere of the brainh, they can name the chicken, they can write down the name and describe it verbally, but they can't draw a copy of it. Many such experiments have been conducted, and they give very consistent results. That's how we're wired.

Fortunately most of us have intact corpus callosums, so we function as single  minds which is confusing enough as it is. But here's the thing. Our right brains and left brains do the processing of what we get from our various sensoria before we swap it over to the other half.

Top: Kim Basinger butt nekkid in a wild scene from the utterly shocking mainstream film "Nine and A Half Weeks." Bottom: Madison Scott bounces on Mark Davis' cock while bound and gagged in Kink.com shoot 9799 "Taboo Teaching."

So when you have those visual memories of porn images you've seen and you compare them to the mainstream "sexy" images you've seen, your right brain has already processed it, because that's what it does. And so when it goes across the corpus callosum, you already "know" at a fundamental, nonverbal level that the porn image is a LOT sexier, wilder and more shocking than the mainstream images are. And that the claims about the mainstream images are a variety of bullshit.

These porn images totally destroy the verbal narrative about the mainstream media images in the text even before the analytical mind can compare the images. So there's never an argument, people don't have to verbally process the imagery to know that the claims about it are bullshit.

That is exactly why I have larded this article with mainstream media sexy images in conjunction with hardcore online porn images. All the words in this post, as artfully composed as they are, are just spacers for the images that have actually convinced you of the truth of my proposal that mainstream media are losing a battle they do not even know they are engaged in. You have already been persuaded by the images, my words are just to explain how and why.

Mainstream media think they can wall off their little section of the internet, but they can't. Porn is out there, the images are their own propaganda. They jump right over any garden walls and get to work right in the brain before any words can get in there and confuse things.

These phenomena have a lot of interesting implications. I'll address some of them in a future post.

Bobbi Starr (right) puts a wand right where it will do the most good to Sensei Pearl (left) in kink.com video 13716. In the process they are proving they can look absolutely gorgeous while having sex. This is racy, sexy, wild and so forth. Thanks to this and all the other images in this article, your right brain's Overton window has been embiggened. You have new standards for racy, sexy and wild. And for beauty. And you can't unsee any of it. Seeing is believing! You're welcome!